Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24672511›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2014

Vibrio chromosome-specific families.

Oksana Lukjancenko, David W Ussery

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Atypical El TorMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Genomic Analysis Reveals Adaptation ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) byMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Vibrio ecology, pathogenesis, and evolution.Frontiers in microbiology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Oksana LukjancenkoDepartment of Systems Biology, Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark Lyngby, Denmark.
David W UsseryDepartment of Systems Biology, Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark Lyngby, Denmark ; Comparative Genomics Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Biosciences Division Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory · USTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have compared chromosome-specific genes in a set of 18 finished Vibrio genomes, and, in addition, also calculated the pan- and core-genomes from a data set of more than 250 draft Vibrio genome sequences. These genomes come from 9 known species and 2 unknown species. Within the finished chromosomes, we find a core set of 1269 encoded protein families for chromosome 1, and a core of 252 encoded protein families for chromosome 2. Many of these core proteins are also found in the draft genomes (although which chromosome they are located on is unknown.) Of the chromosome specific core protein families, 1169 and 153 are uniquely found in chromosomes 1 and 2, respectively. Gene ontology (GO) terms for each of the protein families were determined, and the different sets for each chromosome were compared. A total of 363 different "Molecular Function" GO categories were found for chromosome 1 specific protein families, and these include several broad activities: pyridoxine 5' phosphate synthetase, glucosylceramidase, heme transport, DNA ligase, amino acid binding, and ribosomal components; in contrast, chromosome 2 specific protein families have only 66 Molecular Function GO terms and include many membrane-associated activities, such as ion channels, transmembrane transporters, and electron transport chain proteins. Thus, it appears that whilst there are many "housekeeping systems" encoded in chromosome 1, there are far fewer core functions found in chromosome 2. However, the presence of many membrane-associated encoded proteins in chromosome 2 is surprising.

Indexed as

chromosome-specific genescomparative genomicsVibrio comparative genomicsVibrio core-genomeVibrio pan-genome

Identifiers

PMID24672511
PMCPMC3957060
OpenAlexW2011546318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.