Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24672386›Full record

ReviewTheScientificWorldJournal2014

Competing endogenous RNA: the key to posttranscriptional regulation.

Rituparno Sen, Suman Ghosal, Shaoli Das, Subrata Balti, Jayprokas Chakrabarti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed, 324 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rituparno SenGyanxet, BF 286 Salt Lake, Kolkata, West Bengal 700064, India.
Suman GhosalIndian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Kolkata, West Bengal 700032, India.
Shaoli DasIndian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Kolkata, West Bengal 700032, India.
Subrata BaltiIndian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Kolkata, West Bengal 700032, India.
Jayprokas ChakrabartiGyanxet, BF 286 Salt Lake, Kolkata, West Bengal 700064, India ; Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Kolkata, West Bengal 700032, India.
Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competing endogenous RNA, ceRNA, vie with messenger RNAs (mRNAs) for microRNAs (miRNAs) with shared miRNAs responses elements (MREs) and act as modulator of miRNA by influencing the available level of miRNA. It has recently been discovered that, apart from protein-coding ceRNAs, pseudogenes, long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs act as miRNA "sponges" by sharing common MRE, inhibiting normal miRNA targeting activity on mRNA. These MRE sharing elements form the posttranscriptional ceRNA network to regulate mRNA expression. ceRNAs are widely implicated in many biological processes. Recent studies have identified ceRNAs associated with a number of diseases including cancer. This brief review focuses on the molecular mechanism of ceRNA as part of the complex post-transcriptional regulatory circuit in cell and the impact of ceRNAs in development and disease.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalHumansMicroRNAsRNARNA, CircularRNA, MessengerMicroRNAsRNARNA, CircularRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID24672386
PMCPMC3929601
OpenAlexW2008468705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.