Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24672235›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2014

Cytotoxicity of graphene oxide and graphene oxide loaded with doxorubicin on human multiple myeloma cells.

Shaoling Wu, Xindong Zhao, Zhongguang Cui, Chunting Zhao, Yuzhen Wang, Li Du, Yanhui Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Nanoparticle-Mediated Combination Therapy: Two-in-One Approach for Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shaoling WuDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Xindong ZhaoDepartment of Hematology, Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Zhongguang CuiDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Chunting ZhaoDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Yuzhen WangDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Li DuDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Yanhui LiLaboratory of Fiber Materials and Modern Textile, The Growing Base for State Key Laboratory, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Qingdao University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of human multiple myeloma cells (RPMI-8226) treated with graphene oxide (GO), doxorubicin (DOX), and GO loaded with DOX (GO/DOX). Cell viability was determined using the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay and analyzing the cell cycle and cell apoptosis. Cells treated with GO, GO/DOX, and pure DOX for 24 hours showed a decrease in proliferation. GO/DOX significantly inhibited cell proliferation as compared with pure DOX (P<0.01). When the effects of GO were removed, there was no observed difference between GO/DOX and pure DOX (P>0.05). Flow cytometry analysis of untreated and GO-, DOX-, and GO/DOX-treated cells found no significant differences in the G0/G1 phase (P>0.05), while significant differences were observed in the total apoptotic rates (P<0.05). No significant differences existed in the total apoptotic rates of GO-treated and untreated cells (P>0.05). These findings suggest that GO caused low cytotoxicity and did not induce cell apoptosis or change the cell cycle in multiple myeloma cells. Moreover, GO did not affect the antitumor activity of DOX. In conclusion, GO would be suitable as an anticancer drug nanocarrier and used to treat hematological malignancies.

Indexed as

Antibiotics, AntineoplasticApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalDiffusionDoxorubicinGraphiteHumansMultiple MyelomaNanocapsulesOxidesTreatment OutcomeAntibiotics, AntineoplasticDoxorubicinGraphiteNanocapsulesOxidesCCK-8cell apoptosiscell cycledoxorubicingraphene oxidehuman multiple myeloma cell

Identifiers

PMID24672235
PMCPMC3961069
OpenAlexW2147867809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.