Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24672187›Full record

ArticleJournal of mid-life health2013

Correlation between clinical presentation and urodynamic findings in women attending urogynecology clinic.

Deeksha Pandey, Gasser Anna, Ottenschlaeger Hana, Fuenfgeld Christian

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mid-life health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Midlife disorders.Journal of mid-life health · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Deeksha PandeyDepartment of OBGYN, KMC Manipal, Manipal University, Karnataka, India.
Gasser AnnaDepartment of OBGYN, Waldburg-Zeil Kliniken Klinik Tettnang, Tettnang, Germany.
Ottenschlaeger HanaDepartment of OBGYN, Waldburg-Zeil Kliniken Klinik Tettnang, Tettnang, Germany.
Fuenfgeld ChristianDepartment of OBGYN, Waldburg-Zeil Kliniken Klinik Tettnang, Tettnang, Germany.
Waldburg-Zeil Kliniken · DEManipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUrodynamic studies objectively observe lower urinary tract function and dysfunction so that an appropriate treatment can be planned. In the present study, we tried to evaluate the role of urodynamic studies in the final diagnosis and management plan in patients attending an urogynecology clinic. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis observational study was conducted in an urogynecology clinic. 202 women were included. After detailed history, pelvic examination and introital sonography these women were subjected to urodynamic study. During the filling cystometry detrusor activity, first desire to void and bladder capacity was recorded. This was followed by urethral pressure measurements, when functional urethral length, maximum urethral closure pressure and stress urethral pressure profile was recorded.

resultsMost prevalent complaint was mixed urinary incontinence (33.17%), followed by stress incontinence (31.68%) and urge incontinence (13.37%). According to the standard urodynamic definition 66.33% were normal in the population studied. None of the urodynamic parameters individually or in combination were found to be very useful for establishing a diagnosis.

conclusionEstablishment of the final diagnosis of urinary incontinence and planning of management should be based on detailed history, physical examination, bladder diaries, and careful interpretation of urodynamic data. Urodynamic study; however, doesn't seem to be imperative to establish a diagnosis in uncomplicated cases where symptoms and signs are reliable and correlating.

Indexed as

Mixed incontinencestress incontinenceurge incontinenceurodynamic findings

Identifiers

PMID24672187
PMCPMC3952406
OpenAlexW2044822706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.