Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24672019›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Cue-induced craving increases impulsivity via changes in striatal value signals in problem gamblers.

Stephan F Miedl, Christian Büchel, Jan Peters

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Craving in gambling disorder: A systematic review.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Attenuated Directed Exploration during Reinforcement Learning in Gambling Disorder.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephan F MiedlDepartment of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany, Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Health Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria, Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720.
Christian Büchel
Jan Peters
Universität Hamburg · DEStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impulsive behavior such as steep temporal discounting is a hallmark of addiction and is associated with relapse. In pathological gamblers, discounting may be further increased by the presence of gambling-related cues in the environment, but the extent to which the gambling relatedness of task settings affects reward responses in gambling addiction is debated. In the present study, human problem gamblers made choices between immediate rewards and individually tailored larger-but-later rewards while visual gambling-related scenes were presented in the background. N = 17 participants were scanned using fMRI, whereas N = 5 additional participants completed a behavioral version of the task. Postscan craving ratings were acquired for each image, and behavioral and neuroimaging data were analyzed separately for high- and low-craving trials (median split analysis). Discounting was steeper for high versus low craving trials. Neuroimaging revealed a positive correlation with model-based subjective value in midbrain and striatum in low-craving trials that was reversed in high-craving trials. These findings reveal a modulation of striatal reward responses in gamblers by addiction-related cues, and highlight a potentially important mechanism that may contribute to relapse. Cue-induced changes in striatal delayed reward signals may lead to increased discounting of future rewards, which might in turn affect the likelihood of relapse.

Indexed as

CuesAdultBehavior, AddictiveComputer SimulationCorpus StriatumGamblingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImpulsive BehaviorMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOxygenPhotic StimulationRewardOxygenaddictiongamblingreward

Identifiers

PMID24672019
PMCPMC6608125
OpenAlexW1976261289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.