Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24672011›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Cholinergic inputs from Basal forebrain add an excitatory bias to odor coding in the olfactory bulb.

Markus Rothermel, Ryan M Carey, Adam Puche, Michael T Shipley, Matt Wachowiak

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Recalibrating Olfactory Neuroscience to the Range of Naturally Occurring Odor Concentrations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  10. [Application of optogenetic technology in the research on olfactory bulb neural projection from advanced brain regions to regulate olfactory signal processing].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Conserved neural dynamics and computations across species in olfaction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Markus RothermelDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Brain Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84103, and Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
Ryan M Carey
Adam Puche
Michael T Shipley
Matt Wachowiak
University of Utah · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Olfactory Glomeruli: Cellular and Network MechanismsR01DC005676 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SHIPLEY, MICHAEL THOMAS · 2002 to 2017
$5.8M
Supplement to Basal Forebrain Modulation of Olfactory Bulb FunctionR01DC010915 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI PUCHE, ADAM C · 2011 to 2022
$5.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC10915NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005676NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholinergic modulation of central circuits is associated with active sensation, attention, and learning, yet the neural circuits and temporal dynamics underlying cholinergic effects on sensory processing remain unclear. Understanding the effects of cholinergic modulation on particular circuits is complicated by the widespread projections of cholinergic neurons to telencephalic structures that themselves are highly interconnected. Here we examined how cholinergic projections from basal forebrain to the olfactory bulb (OB) modulate output from the first stage of sensory processing in the mouse olfactory system. By optogenetically activating their axons directly in the OB, we found that cholinergic projections from basal forebrain regulate OB output by increasing the spike output of presumptive mitral/tufted cells. Cholinergic stimulation increased mitral/tufted cell spiking in the absence of inhalation-driven sensory input and further increased spiking responses to inhalation of odorless air and to odorants. This modulation was rapid and transient, was dependent on local cholinergic signaling in the OB, and differed from modulation by optogenetic activation of cholinergic neurons in basal forebrain, which led to a mixture of mitral/tufted cell excitation and suppression. Finally, bulbar cholinergic enhancement of mitral/tufted cell odorant responses was robust and occurred independent of the strength or even polarity of the odorant-evoked response, indicating that cholinergic modulation adds an excitatory bias to mitral/tufted cells as opposed to increasing response gain or sharpening response spectra. These results are consistent with a role for the basal forebrain cholinergic system in dynamically regulating the sensitivity to or salience of odors during active sensing of the olfactory environment.

Indexed as

BiasOdorantsAction PotentialsAnimalsAxonsBacterial ProteinsChannelrhodopsinsCholine O-AcetyltransferaseCholinergic AgentsCholinergic NeuronsFemaleLuminescent ProteinsMaleMecamylamineMiceMice, TransgenicBacterial ProteinsChannelrhodopsinsCholine O-AcetyltransferaseCholinergic AgentsLuminescent ProteinsMecamylamineScopolamineyellow fluorescent protein, Bacteriaacetylcholinemitral cellmodulationodor codingoptogenetics

Identifiers

PMID24672011
PMCPMC3965788
OpenAlexW2013280990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.