ArticleEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2015
Nanomedicine I: In vitro and in vivo evaluation of paclitaxel loaded poly-(ε-caprolactone), poly (DL-lactide-co-glycolide) and poly (DL-lactic acid) matrix nanoparticles in wistar rats.
Article in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroprotective Potential of Encapsulated Pomegranate Peel Polyphenols in Doxorubicin- Induced Neurotoxicity.Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Hazard Assessment of Polymeric Nanobiomaterials for Drug Delivery: What Can We Learn From Literature So Far.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Progress in nanoscience and nanotechnology laid foundation for nanotherapy-based approach in cancer drug delivery for improved therapy and quality of life. The prepared polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs), PCL, PLGA and PLA NPs help in delivering paclitaxel (TAX) in vivo by avoiding the use of unsafe excipient, Cremophore EL. The classy microscopic examination SEM, TEM and AFM analysis revealed the spherical and smooth structure of the NPs as well as their homogeneous solid matrix without any amorphous arrangements. The FTIR analysis of PNPs exposed that there was no chemical interaction between polymer, stabilizer and TAX. The (1)H NMR and XRD analyses illustrate molecular dispersion of TAX in the polymeric matrix and no evidence was observed for the presence of crystalline TAX. The outcome of in vivo acute toxicity study endorses residual solvent free PNPs. The PNPs demonstrate excellent control in delivering TAX up to 48 h with best fitted to First-order, Baker-Lonsdale, Higuchi and Korsmeyer-Peppas model. The log plasma concentration-time profile shows that the prepared PNPs were safe and have much less side-effects. The pharmacokinetic study results illustrate increase in mean residence time as result of long circulating nature of the prepared nanoparticles, which helps them to reach target area. The estimated pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0-∞ (ng h)/mL, AUMC0-∞ (ng h(2))/mL, C max (ng/mL), t 1/2 (h), MRT (h), Cl (L/h/kg), V ss (L/kg) and V z (L/kg) shows improved therapeutic efficacy when compared with TAX solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.