Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24671876›Full record

ArticleBiology of reproduction2014

Generation of transgenic pigs by cytoplasmic injection of piggyBac transposase-based pmGENIE-3 plasmids.

Zicong Li, Fang Zeng, Fanming Meng, Zhiqian Xu, Xianwei Zhang, Xiaoling Huang, Fei Tang, Wenchao Gao, Junsong Shi, Xiaoyan He and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of reproduction, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pig Genome Editing for Agriculture: Achievements and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Molecular breeding of pigs in the genome editing era.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Applications ofStem cells international · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Pharmaceutics · 2020
    Review
  12. In VivoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Avian Bioreactor Systems: A Review.Molecular biotechnology · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zicong LiDepartment of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Fang Zeng
Fanming Meng
Zhiqian Xu
Xianwei Zhang
Xiaoling Huang
Fei Tang
Wenchao Gao
Junsong Shi
Xiaoyan He
Dewu Liu
Chong Wang
Johann Urschitz
Stefan Moisyadi
Zhenfang Wu
South China Agricultural University · CNPacific Biosciences (United States) · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USWen's Food Group (China) · CN

Funding

RESEARCH DESIGN AND BIOSTATISTICS COREU54MD007584 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI MOKUAU, NOREEN, SHIRAMIZU, BRUCE T · 2012 to 2018
$21.1M
Transgenic Mouse, ICSI and IVF CoreP20GM103457 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI WARD, WILLIAM S · 2012 to 2018
$12.9M
ULTRASOUND-TARGETED MICROBUBBLE DESTRUCTION IN COMBINATION WITH THE PIGGYBACP20RR024206 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI YAMAZAKI, YUKIKO · 2008 to 2011
$8.4M
Transposon Based Mammalian Transgenesis and TransfectionR01GM083158 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI MOISYADI, STEFAN · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NCRR NIH HHS 5P20RR024206NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR024206NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103457NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083158NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083158-01A1NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of transgenesis involves the introduction of a foreign gene, the transgene, into the genome of an animal. Gene transfer by pronuclear microinjection (PNI) is the predominant method used to produce transgenic animals. However, this technique does not always result in germline transgenic offspring and has a low success rate for livestock. Alternate approaches, such as somatic cell nuclear transfer using transgenic fibroblasts, do not show an increase in efficiency compared to PNI, while viral-based transgenesis is hampered by issues regarding transgene size and biosafety considerations. We have recently described highly successful transgenesis experiments with mice using a piggyBac transposase-based vector, pmhyGENIE-3. This construct, a single and self-inactivating plasmid, contains all the transpositional elements necessary for successful gene transfer. In this series of experiments, our laboratories have implemented cytoplasmic injection (CTI) of pmGENIE-3 for transgene delivery into in vivo-fertilized pig zygotes. More than 8.00% of the injected embryos developed into transgenic animals containing monogenic and often single transgenes in their genome. However, the CTI technique was unsuccessful during the injection of in vitro-fertilized pig zygotes. In summary, here we have described a method that is not only easy to implement, but also demonstrated the highest efficiency rate for nonviral livestock transgenesis.

Indexed as

TransgenesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAnimals, NewbornBlotting, SouthernDNAEmbryo TransferFemaleGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesMaleMicroinjectionsPlasmidsPolymerase Chain ReactionSwineTransposasesDNATransposasespigpiggyBacpmGENIE-3transgenesistransposase

Identifiers

PMID24671876
PMCPMC4076374
OpenAlexW2128510424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.