Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24671798›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014

Performance of galactomannan, beta-d-glucan, Aspergillus lateral-flow device, conventional culture, and PCR tests with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.

M Hoenigl, J Prattes, B Spiess, J Wagner, F Prueller, R B Raggam, V Posch, W Duettmann, K Hoenigl, A Wölfler and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Aspergillus Polymerase Chain Reaction: Systematic Review of Evidence for Clinical Use in Comparison With Antigen Testing.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Successful salvage treatment ofMedical mycology case reports · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Aspergillosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Plasma Microbial Cell-free DNA Metagenomic Sequencing for Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Diseases Among High-risk Outpatient and Inpatient Immunocompromised Hosts.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

M HoeniglSection of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria Division of Pulmonology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria martin.hoenigl@medunigraz.at dieter.buchheidt@umm.de.
J PrattesSection of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
B SpiessDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Mannheim University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
J WagnerSection of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
F PruellerClinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
R B RaggamDivision of Hematology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
V PoschSection of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
W DuettmannDivision of Hematology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
K HoeniglSection of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
A WölflerDivision of Hematology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
C KoidlInstitute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
W BuzinaInstitute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
M ReinwaldDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Mannheim University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
C R ThorntonBiosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
R KrauseSection of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
D BuchheidtDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Mannheim University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany martin.hoenigl@medunigraz.at dieter.buchheidt@umm.de.
Medical University of Graz · ATUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity Medical Centre Mannheim · DEUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Galactomannan detection in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid samples (GM test) is currently considered the gold standard test for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). The limitations, however, are the various turnaround times and availability of testing. We compared the performance of GM testing with that of conventional culture, an Aspergillus lateral-flow-device (LFD) test, a beta-d-glucan (BDG) test, and an Aspergillus PCR assay by using BAL fluid samples from immunocompromised patients. A total of 78 BAL fluid samples from 78 patients at risk for IPA (74 samples from Graz and 4 from Mannheim) collected between December 2012 and May 2013 at two university hospitals in Austria and Germany were included. Three patients had proven IPA, 14 probable IPA, and 17 possible IPA, and 44 patients had no IPA. The diagnostic accuracies of the different methods for probable/proven IPA were evaluated. The diagnostic odds ratios were the highest for the GM, PCR, and LFD tests. The sensitivities for the four methods (except culture) were between 70 and 88%. The combination of the GM (cutoff optical density index [ODI], >1.0) and LFD tests increased the sensitivity to 94%, while the combination of the GM test (>1.0) and PCR resulted in 100% sensitivity (specificity for probable/proven IPA, 95 to 98%). The performance of conventional culture was limited by low sensitivity, while that of the BDG test was limited by low specificity. We evaluated established and novel diagnostic methods for IPA and found that the Aspergillus PCR, LFD, and GM tests were the most useful methods for diagnosing the disease by using BAL fluid samples. In particular, the combination of the GM test and PCR or, if PCR is not available, the LFD test, allows for sensitive and specific diagnosis of IPA.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntigens, FungalAspergillusAustriaBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidChromatography, AffinityDNA, FungalFemaleGalactoseGermanyGlucansHospitals, UniversityHumansImmunocompromised HostInvasive Pulmonary AspergillosisAntigens, FungalDNA, FungalgalactomannanGalactoseGlucansMannans

Identifiers

PMID24671798
PMCPMC4042784
OpenAlexW2014582252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.