Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24671766›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2014

Rapid identification of mRNA processing defects with a novel single-cell yeast reporter.

Matthew R Sorenson, Scott W Stevens

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Spliceosomal intronogenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew R Sorenson
Scott W Stevens
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Spliceosome disassembly and intron turnoverR01GM084246 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI STEVENS, SCOTT W · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM084246NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has become increasingly evident that gene expression processes in eukaryotes involve communication and coordination between many complex, independent macromolecular machines. To query these processes and to explore the potential relationships between them in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we designed a versatile reporter using multicolor high-throughput flow cytometry. Due to its design, this single reporter exhibits a distinctive signature for many defects in gene expression including transcription, histone modification, pre-mRNA splicing, mRNA export, nonsense-mediated decay, and mRNA degradation. Analysis of the reporter in 4967 nonessential yeast genes revealed striking phenotypic overlaps between chromatin remodeling, histone modification, and pre-mRNA splicing. Additionally, we developed a copper-inducible reporter, with which we demonstrate that 5-fluorouracil mimics the mRNA decay phenotype of cells lacking the 3'-5' exonuclease Rrp6p. Our reporter is capable of performing high-throughput, rapid, and large-scale screens to identify and characterize genetic and chemical perturbations of the major eukaryotic gene expression processes.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyGene Expression Regulation, FungalNonsense Mediated mRNA DecayRNA PrecursorsRNA SplicingRNA StabilitySaccharomyces cerevisiaeRNA Precursorsdrug screeningflow cytometrygene expressionmRNA processingpre-mRNA splicing

Identifiers

PMID24671766
PMCPMC3988574
OpenAlexW2112369984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.