Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24671645›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2014

Sporoderm and tapetum development in Eupomatia laurina (Eupomatiaceae). An interpretation.

Nina I Gabarayeva, Valentina V Grigorjeva

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nina I GabarayevaKomarov Botanical Institute, Popov st. 2, 197376, St. Petersburg, Russia, 1906ng@mail.ru.
Valentina V Grigorjeva
Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the first time, the developmental events in the course of exine structure establishment have been traced in detail with TEM in Eupomatia, with the addition of cytochemical tests. A new look at unfolding events is suggested using our recent hypothesis on self-assembling micellar mesophases. The process proved to be unusual and includes "ghost" stages. The first units observed in the periplasmic space are spherical ones (= normal spherical micelles). These accumulate, resulting in a granular layer up to middle tetrad stage. Sporopollenin precursor accumulation on these units makes the ectexine layer looking as homogenous at late tetrad stage. Simultaneously, the columns of globules are added in the periplasmic space, which reminds an attempt to form columellae; but, the process failed. Instead, a fimbrillate endexine layer of compressed globules appears. The latter augments via additional globules, appearing in the periplasmic space in the free microspore period. The endexine formation is double-stepped spatially and temporally. The second, lamellate endexine layer (laminate micelles) appears late in development, when the channeled intine-I is already established-a very unusual feature. Moreover, a "fenestrated" stage comes unexpectedly at vacuolate stage, when hitherto amorphous ectexine appears pierced by cavernae-the results of reversal of normal spherical micelles (constituents of ectexine) to reverse the ones that open their cores for the entrance of hydrophilic nutrients from tapetum and give them over to the microspore cytoplasm by exchanging their solubilizates.

Indexed as

MagnoliopsidaMeiosisPollenVacuoles

Identifiers

PMID24671645
OpenAlexW2049644258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.