Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24671639›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2014

Innovative rapid gene methylation analysis of surgical margin tissues in head and neck cancer.

Masamichi Hayashi, Rafael Guerrero-Preston, Jun Okamura, Christina Michailidi, Zubair Kahn, Xiufeng Li, Julie Ahn, Marla Goldsmith, Wayne Koch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cancers · 2024
    Article
  2. Histology: The gold standard for diagnosis?The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2019
    Article
  7. Identification ofOncology letters · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Masamichi HayashiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Rafael Guerrero-Preston
Jun Okamura
Christina Michailidi
Zubair Kahn
Xiufeng Li
Julie Ahn
Marla Goldsmith
Wayne Koch
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
GENETIC ALTERATIONS AS DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC BIOMARKR01DE013152 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KOCH, WAYNE M · 1999 to 2013
$5.0M
Epigenomic Markers of HNSCC Survival Across Ethnic GroupsK01CA164092 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GUERRERO-PRESTON, RAFAEL · 2011 to 2014
$530k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA164092NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecuring the negative surgical margin is the first step in surgical cancer treatment. However, tumor recurrence sometimes occurs even with histologically negative surgical margins. To detect minimal residual cancer cells in the deep margin intraoperatively, a time-efficient molecular approach is required.

methodsWe established an innovative rapid quantitative methylation PCR (QMSP) assay, which consists of substantially time-minimized DNA extraction, bisulfite treatment, and QMSP assays. To demonstrate the feasibility of this procedure, 10 serial surgical specimens of primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) were evaluated by both rapid and conventional QMSP. Two frequently methylated genes in head and neck cancer, homeobox A9 (HOXA9) and endothelin receptor type B (EDNRB) were analyzed in 10 HNSCCs and surgical margin tissues, as well as normal muscle and oral mucosa samples.

resultsThe product quality of DNA extraction and bisulfite treatment using the time-saving procedure was comparable to the conventional procedure. In the QMSP assay, target gene methylation and reference gene methylation were equally detected by both the rapid and conventional method. Finally, relative results of rapid and conventional QMSP were quite similar to each other in tumors, margins, and normal tissues. The average total time required for the rapid QMSP procedure was less than 3 h and could be accomplished by a single person.

conclusionFrom the viewpoint of accuracy, cost, and time consumption, the innovative rapid QMSP maintains highly sensitive methylation detection accomplished within the time frame of a major ablative and reconstructive procedure.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAgedAged, 80 and overBase SequenceBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellDNA, NeoplasmFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHead and Neck NeoplasmsHomeodomain ProteinsHumansIntraoperative PeriodMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Sequence DataBiomarkers, TumorDNA, NeoplasmEDNRB protein, humanhomeobox protein HOXA9Homeodomain ProteinsReceptor, Endothelin BReceptors, Endothelin

Identifiers

PMID24671639
PMCPMC4834866
OpenAlexW2137411939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.