Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24671481›Full record

ArticleThe Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology2014

Communicative participation and quality of life in head and neck cancer.

Tanya L Eadie, Kristin Lamvik, Carolyn R Baylor, Kathryn M Yorkston, Jiseon Kim, Dagmar Amtmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Measurement properties of self-report questionnaires on health-related quality of life and functional health status in dysphonia: a systematic review using the COSMIN taxonomy.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Communicative Participation and Quality of Life in Pretreatment Oral and Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessments used to measure participation in life activities in individuals with cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Speech and Communicative Participation in Patients With Facial Paralysis.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2018
    Article
  12. Role of Psychosocial Factors on Communicative Participation among Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tanya L EadieDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kristin Lamvik
Carolyn R Baylor
Kathryn M Yorkston
Jiseon Kim
Dagmar Amtmann
University of Washington · US

Funding

Measuring communicative participation in adults with communication disordersR03DC010044 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BAYLOR, CAROLYN RAE · 2009 to 2011
$460k
Communicative Participation in Head and Neck CancerR03CA132525 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EADIE, TANYA L · 2008 to 2010
$156k
NCI NIH HHS 1R03CA132525-01A1NCI NIH HHS R03 CA132525NIDCD NIH HHS 1R03DC010044NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC010044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine how a new self-report outcome measure of communicative participation, the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB), related to disease- and discipline-specific quality of life (QOL) outcomes in a head and neck cancer (HNC) population.

methodsOne hundred ninety-five individuals treated for HNC completed the CPIB, the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire (UW-QOL), and the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10).

resultsResults revealed moderate QOL scores across the UW-QOL (mean scores: global QOL = 66; physical subscale = 70; social-emotional subscale = 73) and VHI-10 (mean = 16). Correlations between the CPIB and the UW-QOL scores were statistically significant (P < .001) but relatively weak (r = .37-.38). As hypothesized, a stronger correlation was found between the CPIB and the VHI-10 (r = -0.79; P < .001).

conclusionClinicians may consider adopting the CPIB to complement existing tools in assessing communication outcomes after HNC.

Indexed as

CommunicationQuality of LifeSelf ReportSocial BehaviorAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultcommunicationhead and neck canceroutcome measuresquality of lifespeech

Identifiers

PMID24671481
PMCPMC4374344
OpenAlexW2115364123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.