Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24671370›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2014

Calcium supplementation: is protecting against osteoporosis counter to protecting against cardiovascular disease?

Connie M Weaver

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and risk of fractures: an updated meta-analysis from the National Osteoporosis Foundation.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Current Status of the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Vitamin D supplementation after the menopause.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Nutrition in Cardioskeletal Health.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Life-course approach to nutrition.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Diet, gut microbiome, and bone health.Current osteoporosis reports · 2015
    Review
  14. Lifestyle and osteoporosis.Current osteoporosis reports · 2015
    Review
  15. The role of calcium in human aging.Clinical nutrition research · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Connie M WeaverDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, 700 W State Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA, weavercm@purdue.edu.
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcium is the dominant mineral in bone and is a shortfall nutrient in the diet. For those consuming inadequate dietary calcium, calcium supplements have been a standard strategy for prevention of osteoporosis. Recently, calcium supplementation has been linked to both increased and decreased cardiovascular disease risk creating considerable uncertainty. Moreover, recent reports have shed uncertainty over the effectiveness of calcium supplements to reduce risk of fracture. The evidence for calcium supplementation effects to both reduce risk of fracture and increase coronary heart disease and mortality are reviewed. Although the importance of good calcium nutrition is well known, determining the advantage of calcium supplementation to either bone or heart health has been hampered by poor subject compliance and study design flaws. At present, the current Recommended Dietary Allowances for calcium still appear to be a good target with potential risks for chronic disease if intakes fall too short or greatly exceed these recommendations.

Indexed as

Calcium, DietaryCalciumCardiovascular DiseasesDietary SupplementsHumansMyocardial InfarctionOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesRisk FactorsVascular CalcificationCalciumCalcium, Dietary

Identifiers

PMID24671370
OpenAlexW2134470904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.