ArticleBMJ case reports2014
The importance of genetic mutation screening to determine retransplantation following failed kidney allograft from recurrent atypical haemolytic ureamic syndrome.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thrombotic microangiopathy after renal transplantation: Current insights inWorld journal of transplantation · 2018Review
- Complement related kidney diseases: Recurrence after transplantation.World journal of transplantation · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the case of a patient with familial atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) who underwent successful retransplantation 30 months following his failed first kidney allograft from recurrent aHUS. He achieved excellent graft function (creatinine 90 μmol/L), with no evidence of disease recurrence on standard maintenance immunosuppression 9 months after his second deceased donor kidney transplantation. Genetic mutation testing was not available prior to first transplant but screening prior to retransplant identified the patient as having a newly discovered mutation, c.T3566A, within exon 23 of the complement factor H (CFH) gene. Currently, public financing and subsidisation for eculizumab, a costly but effect complement (C5) inhibitor for the treatment of aHUS is not available in Australia. The decision for retransplantation must balance between the risk of disease recurrence and greater risk of death on dialysis. The absence of a more severe CFH genotype assisted in the decision for retransplantation and suggests the importance of genetic mutation screening in order to stratify the risk of disease recurrence and graft loss versus the benefit of transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.