Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24671321›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2014

The importance of genetic mutation screening to determine retransplantation following failed kidney allograft from recurrent atypical haemolytic ureamic syndrome.

Samantha Chua, Germaine Wong, Wai Hon Lim

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samantha ChuaDepartment of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Germaine Wong
Wai Hon Lim

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the case of a patient with familial atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) who underwent successful retransplantation 30 months following his failed first kidney allograft from recurrent aHUS. He achieved excellent graft function (creatinine 90 μmol/L), with no evidence of disease recurrence on standard maintenance immunosuppression 9 months after his second deceased donor kidney transplantation. Genetic mutation testing was not available prior to first transplant but screening prior to retransplant identified the patient as having a newly discovered mutation, c.T3566A, within exon 23 of the complement factor H (CFH) gene. Currently, public financing and subsidisation for eculizumab, a costly but effect complement (C5) inhibitor for the treatment of aHUS is not available in Australia. The decision for retransplantation must balance between the risk of disease recurrence and greater risk of death on dialysis. The absence of a more severe CFH genotype assisted in the decision for retransplantation and suggests the importance of genetic mutation screening in order to stratify the risk of disease recurrence and graft loss versus the benefit of transplantation.

Indexed as

Atypical Hemolytic Uremic SyndromeComplement Factor HGenetic TestingHumansKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationMaleMutationRecurrenceReoperationYoung AdultComplement Factor H

Identifiers

PMID24671321
PMCPMC3975487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.