Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24671249›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2014

[Detection of circulating tumor cells from peripheral blood in prostate cancer].

M Thalgott, M M Heck, K Pantel

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M ThalgottUrologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland, mark.thalgott@lrz.tum.de.
M M Heck
K Pantel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can be detected with sensitive immunocytological and molecular methods and can potentially cause distant metastases. Consecutively the prognostic significance of CTC-counts for survival was demonstrated in metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) revealing CTCs as reliable surrogate marker during therapy. Comparatively the prognostic value of a CTC-threshold with < 5 vs. ≥ 5 CTCs was superior to the commonly used PSA-decrement algorithms. In contrast despite evidence of CTCs in localized PC, their clinical value in this stage is currently precarious. Furthermore, CTCs may serve as predictive markers with the ability to predict treatment sensitivity or resistance, since they may represent the heterogeneous molecular signature of primary as well as metastatic cancer lesions. Thus, the isolation of CTCs may serve not only as a prognostic tool but moreover as a liquid biopsy and a window towards personalized treatment. This review discusses the clinical impact of CTCs in the different stages of PC.

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesBiomarkers, TumorDisease ProgressionHumansMaleNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPrognosisProstateProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.