Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24671248›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2014

[Tumor cells in the peripheral blood of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: detection and impact of circulating].

M Rink, A Soave, O Engel, M Fisch, S Riethdorf, K Pantel

Erratum issuedAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M RinkKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland, mrink@uke.de.
A Soave
O Engel
M Fisch
S Riethdorf
K Pantel
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTC) play a crucial role in the natural history of several malignancies and, thus, are the subject of intense research efforts. This review summarizes the most contemporary literature data regarding detection of CTC and their impact on the oncological prognosis of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). Despite the availability of different methods for CTC detection and isolation in the peripheral blood, the standardized and Food and Drug Administration-approved CellSearch® assay is currently the most commonly used system for CTC detection. The majority of studies did not find any association between presence of CTC and clinicopathologic features. However, CTC have been demonstrated to represent a strong, independent predictor for unfavorable oncological outcomes in UCB. Since the peripheral blood is an easily accessible source, CTC represent a promising biomarker to effectively monitor early disease progression and therapy response in the near future. CTC hold the potential to individualize patient counseling regarding the optimal timing of radical surgery or bladder-sparing treatment as well as multimodal therapies.

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Transitional CellCombined Modality TherapyDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID24671248
OpenAlexW2198926030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.