Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24671182›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Independent polled mutations leading to complex gene expression differences in cattle.

Natalie Wiedemar, Jens Tetens, Vidhya Jagannathan, Annie Menoud, Samuel Neuenschwander, Rémy Bruggmann, Georg Thaller, Cord Drögemüller

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Uncovering the architecture of selection in twoEvolutionary applications · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Phenotypic and Genomic Characterization of theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalie WiedemarInstitute of Genetics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jens TetensInstitute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Vidhya JagannathanInstitute of Genetics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Annie MenoudInstitute of Genetics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Samuel NeuenschwanderInterfaculty Bioinformatics Unit, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Vital-IT, Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Rémy BruggmannInterfaculty Bioinformatics Unit, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Georg ThallerInstitute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Cord DrögemüllerInstitute of Genetics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHKiel University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular regulation of horn growth in ruminants is still poorly understood. To investigate this process, we collected 1019 hornless (polled) animals from different cattle breeds. High-density SNP genotyping confirmed the presence of two different polled associated haplotypes in Simmental and Holstein cattle co-localized on BTA 1. We refined the critical region of the Simmental polled mutation to 212 kb and identified an overlapping region of 932 kb containing the Holstein polled mutation. Subsequently, whole genome sequencing of polled Simmental and Holstein cows was used to determine polled associated genomic variants. By genotyping larger cohorts of animals with known horn status we found a single perfectly associated insertion/deletion variant in Simmental and other beef cattle confirming the recently published possible Celtic polled mutation. We identified a total of 182 sequence variants as candidate mutations for polledness in Holstein cattle, including an 80 kb genomic duplication and three SNPs reported before. For the first time we showed that hornless cattle with scurs are obligate heterozygous for one of the polled mutations. This is in contrast to published complex inheritance models for the bovine scurs phenotype. Studying differential expression of the annotated genes and loci within the mapped region on BTA 1 revealed a locus (LOC100848215), known in cow and buffalo only, which is higher expressed in fetal tissue of wildtype horn buds compared to tissue of polled fetuses. This implicates that the presence of this long noncoding RNA is a prerequisite for horn bud formation. In addition, both transcripts associated with polledness in goat and sheep (FOXL2 and RXFP2), show an overexpression in horn buds confirming their importance during horn development in cattle.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleFemaleHaplotypesHeterozygoteHornsMaleMutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePregnancyRNA, Long NoncodingTranscriptomeRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID24671182
PMCPMC3966897
OpenAlexW2050000305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.