Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24671109›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

DNA compaction induced by a cationic polymer or surfactant impact gene expression and DNA degradation.

Marie-Louise Ainalem, Andrew Bartles, Joscha Muck, Rita S Dias, Anna M Carnerup, Daniele Zink, Tommy Nylander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Protamine Drives Liquid and Solid Condensation of DNA and Glycosaminoglycans.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Trigger-Responsive Gene Transporters for Anticancer Therapy.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marie-Louise AinalemPhysical Chemistry, Center for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Andrew BartlesPhysical Chemistry, Center for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Joscha MuckLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department Biologie II, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Rita S DiasPhysical Chemistry, Center for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anna M CarnerupPhysical Chemistry, Center for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Daniele ZinkLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department Biologie II, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Tommy NylanderPhysical Chemistry, Center for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an increasing interest in achieving gene regulation in biotechnological and biomedical applications by using synthetic DNA-binding agents. Most studies have so far focused on synthetic sequence-specific DNA-binding agents. Such approaches are relatively complicated and cost intensive and their level of sophistication is not always required, in particular for biotechnological application. Our study is inspired by in vivo data that suggest that DNA compaction might contribute to gene regulation. This study exploits the potential of using synthetic DNA compacting agents that are not sequence-specific to achieve gene regulation for in vitro systems. The semi-synthetic in vitro system we use include common cationic DNA-compacting agents, poly(amido amine) (PAMAM) dendrimers and the surfactant hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), which we apply to linearized plasmid DNA encoding for the luciferase reporter gene. We show that complexing the DNA with either of the cationic agents leads to gene expression inhibition in a manner that depends on the extent of compaction. This is demonstrated by using a coupled in vitro transcription-translation system. We show that compaction can also protect DNA against degradation in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, our study shows that these effects are reversible and DNA can be released from the complexes. Release of DNA leads to restoration of gene expression and makes the DNA susceptible to degradation by Dnase. A highly charged polyelectrolyte, heparin, is needed to release DNA from dendrimers, while DNA complexed with CTAB dissociates with the non-ionic surfactant C12E5. Our results demonstrate the relation between DNA compaction by non-specific DNA-binding agents and gene expression and gene regulation can be achieved in vitro systems in a reliable dose-dependent and reversible manner.

Indexed as

DNA DamageGene ExpressionBuffersCationsCetrimoniumCetrimonium CompoundsDendrimersDeoxyribonuclease IDNAHeparinLuciferasesPolymersProtein BiosynthesisSolventsSpectrometry, FluorescenceSurface-Active AgentsBuffersCationsCetrimoniumCetrimonium CompoundsDendrimersDeoxyribonuclease IDNAHeparinLuciferasesPolymersSolventsSurface-Active Agents

Identifiers

PMID24671109
PMCPMC3966812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.