Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24671034›Full record

ReviewEMBO reports2014

Some like it cold: understanding the survival strategies of psychrophiles.

Pieter De Maayer, Dominique Anderson, Craig Cary, Don A Cowan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EMBO reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 227 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
227citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

227 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A cold-responsiveApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effectiveness of two-stage inoculation ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Twenty-two novel glacierISME communications · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

167 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pieter De MaayerCentre for Microbial Ecology and Genomics (CMEG), Department of Genetics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Dominique Anderson
Craig Cary
Don A Cowan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much of the Earth's surface, both marine and terrestrial, is either periodically or permanently cold. Although habitats that are largely or continuously frozen are generally considered to be inhospitable to life, psychrophilic organisms have managed to survive in these environments. This is attributed to their innate adaptive capacity to cope with cold and its associated stresses. Here, we review the various environmental, physiological and molecular adaptations that psychrophilic microorganisms use to thrive under adverse conditions. We also discuss the impact of modern "omic" technologies in developing an improved understanding of these adaptations, highlighting recent work in this growing field.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAntifreeze ProteinsCold TemperatureCell SurvivalCold-Shock ResponseGene Expression RegulationStress, PhysiologicalAntifreeze Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24671034
PMCPMC4210084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.