Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24670770›Full record

ArticleNature2014

A suspension-feeding anomalocarid from the Early Cambrian.

Jakob Vinther, Martin Stein, Nicholas R Longrich, David A T Harper

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The CambrianProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Raptorial appendages of the Cambrian apex predatorProceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Vertically migratingProceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Was the Devonian placodermRoyal Society open science · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jakob VintherSchools of Earth Sciences and Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK.
Martin SteinNatural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen University, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 , Denmark.
Nicholas R LongrichDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
David A T HarperPalaeoecosystems Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large, actively swimming suspension feeders evolved several times in Earth's history, arising independently from groups as diverse as sharks, rays and stem teleost fishes, and in mysticete whales. However, animals occupying this niche have not been identified from the early Palaeozoic era. Anomalocarids, a group of stem arthropods that were the largest nektonic animals of the Cambrian and Ordovician periods, are generally thought to have been apex predators. Here we describe new material from Tamisiocaris borealis, an anomalocarid from the Early Cambrian (Series 2) Sirius Passet Fauna of North Greenland, and propose that its frontal appendage is specialized for suspension feeding. The appendage bears long, slender and equally spaced ventral spines furnished with dense rows of long and fine auxiliary spines. This suggests that T. borealis was a microphagous suspension feeder, using its appendages for sweep-net capture of food items down to 0.5 mm, within the size range of mesozooplankton such as copepods. Our observations demonstrate that large, nektonic suspension feeders first evolved during the Cambrian explosion, as part of an adaptive radiation of anomalocarids. The presence of nektonic suspension feeders in the Early Cambrian, together with evidence for a diverse pelagic community containing phytoplankton and mesozooplankton, indicate the existence of a complex pelagic ecosystem supported by high primary productivity and nutrient flux. Cambrian pelagic ecosystems seem to have been more modern than previously believed.

Indexed as

FossilsAnimalsArthropodsBiological EvolutionEcosystemExtinction, BiologicalFeeding BehaviorGreenlandPhylogenyPhytoplanktonZooplankton

Identifiers

PMID24670770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.