Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24670643›Full record

ArticleNature2014

Constitutional and somatic rearrangement of chromosome 21 in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Yilong Li, Claire Schwab, Sarra Ryan, Elli Papaemmanuil, Hazel M Robinson, Patricia Jacobs, Anthony V Moorman, Sara Dyer, Julian Borrow, Mike Griffiths and 23 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed, 284 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Telomere Crisis Shapes Cancer Evolution.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Chromothripsis in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Chromoanagenesis in Multiple Myeloma: A Comprehensive Overview.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Chromothripsis in myeloid malignancies.Annals of hematology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  19. HYENA detects oncogenes activated by distal enhancers in cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  20. The two sides of chromosomal instability: drivers and brakes in cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 14 institutions in 6 countries.

Yilong Li *Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Claire Schwab *Leukaemia Research Cytogenetics Group, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Sarra Ryan *Leukaemia Research Cytogenetics Group, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Elli PapaemmanuilCancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Hazel M RobinsonWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Patricia JacobsWessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury, UK.
Anthony V MoormanLeukaemia Research Cytogenetics Group, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Sara DyerWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Julian BorrowWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Mike GriffithsWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Nyla A HeeremaDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Andrew J CarrollDepartment of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Polly TalleySheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Nick BownCytogenetics Laboratory, Northern Genetics Service, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Nick TelfordOncology Cytogenetics, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Fiona M RossWessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury, UK.
Lorraine GauntRegional Cytogenetics Unit, Genetic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Richard J Q McNallyInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Bryan D YoungLeukaemia Research Cytogenetics Group, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Paul SinclairLeukaemia Research Cytogenetics Group, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Vikki RandLeukaemia Research Cytogenetics Group, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Manuel R TeixeiraGenetics Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute, and Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), Porto University, Portugal.
Olivia JosephCancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Ben RobinsonCancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Mark MaddisonCancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Nicole DastugueLaboratoire d'hématologie, Génétique des Hémopathies, Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse, France.
Peter VandenbergheCenter for Human Genetics, University Hospital Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Philip J StephensCancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Jiqiu ChengCenter for Human Genetics, University Hospital Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Peter Van LooCancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Michael R StrattonCancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Peter J Campbell *Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Christine J Harrison *Leukaemia Research Cytogenetics Group, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle University · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBKU Leuven · BEHôpital Purpan · FRMunich Leukemia Laboratory (Germany) · DESalisbury NHS Foundation Trust · GBSheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Ohio State University · USUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBWessex Regional Genetics Laboratory · GB

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886Wellcome Trust 077012/Z/05/ZWellcome Trust 088340Wellcome Trust 093867Wellcome Trust WT088340MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in gene dosage are a major driver of cancer, known to be caused by a finite, but increasingly well annotated, repertoire of mutational mechanisms. This can potentially generate correlated copy-number alterations across hundreds of linked genes, as exemplified by the 2% of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) with recurrent amplification of megabase regions of chromosome 21 (iAMP21). We used genomic, cytogenetic and transcriptional analysis, coupled with novel bioinformatic approaches, to reconstruct the evolution of iAMP21 ALL. Here we show that individuals born with the rare constitutional Robertsonian translocation between chromosomes 15 and 21, rob(15;21)(q10;q10)c, have approximately 2,700-fold increased risk of developing iAMP21 ALL compared to the general population. In such cases, amplification is initiated by a chromothripsis event involving both sister chromatids of the Robertsonian chromosome, a novel mechanism for cancer predisposition. In sporadic iAMP21, breakage-fusion-bridge cycles are typically the initiating event, often followed by chromothripsis. In both sporadic and rob(15;21)c-associated iAMP21, the final stages frequently involve duplications of the entire abnormal chromosome. The end-product is a derivative of chromosome 21 or the rob(15;21)c chromosome with gene dosage optimized for leukaemic potential, showing constrained copy-number levels over multiple linked genes. Thus, dicentric chromosomes may be an important precipitant of chromothripsis, as we show rob(15;21)c to be constitutionally dicentric and breakage-fusion-bridge cycles generate dicentric chromosomes somatically. Furthermore, our data illustrate that several cancer-specific mutational processes, applied sequentially, can coordinate to fashion copy-number profiles over large genomic scales, incrementally refining the fitness benefits of aggregated gene dosage changes.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsChromatidsChromosome BreakageChromosomes, Human, Pair 15Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21DNA Copy Number VariationsHumansPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaRecombination, GeneticTranslocation, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID24670643
PMCPMC3976272
OpenAlexW2070007455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.