Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24669829›Full record

Trial reportBMC pulmonary medicine2014

Transient paradoxical bronchospasm associated with inhalation of the LAMA AZD9164: analysis of two Phase I, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

Carin Jorup, Thomas Bengtsson, Kerstin Strandgården, Ulf Sjöbring

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01016951 phase1terminatednot on this map

A Phase I, Multi Centre, Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Multiple Ascending Doses of AZD9164 Given Once Daily as Inhaled Formulation Via Turbuhaler for 13 Days in Healthy Male and Female Subjects and in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2009 to 2010Enrolled36ConditionsHealthy, COPDArmsAZD9164 Turbuhaler®, Placebo Turbuhaler®
NCT01096563 phase1terminatednot on this map

A Phase I, Single Centre, Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Inhaled AZD9164 After Administration of Single and Multiple Ascending Doses for 13 Days in Healthy Male and Female Japanese Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2010 to 2010Enrolled27ConditionsHealthyArmsAZD9164, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oscillometry of the respiratory system: a translational opportunity not to be missed.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carin JorupAstraZeneca R&D Mölndal, Pepparedsleden 1, 431 83 Mölndal, Sweden. carin.jorup@astrazeneca.com.
Thomas Bengtsson
Kerstin Strandgården
Ulf Sjöbring
AstraZeneca (Sweden) · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAZD9164 has demonstrated potential as an inhaled, long-acting, muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) bronchodilator. However, in patients with COPD, but not in healthy subjects, a transient initial drop in FEV1 was observed following inhalation of nebulised doses of AZD9164 in citrate buffer.Two additional studies were conducted to further assess the safety and tolerability of multiple ascending doses of AZD9164 in 27 white and 18 Japanese healthy subjects and in 4 patients with COPD. In these studies, AZD9164 was inhaled via Turbuhaler™.

methodsThese were Phase I, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose (MAD) studies conducted in Sweden and UK. Healthy subjects (mean age 25.9 yrs) and patients with COPD (mean age 66 yrs, mean post-bronchodilator FEV1 60.1% predicted normal value) were randomised 2:1 to active treatment (400, 1000 or 2800 μg delivered doses of AZD9164) or placebo.

resultsNo safety or tolerability concerns were identified in the healthy subjects at doses up to and including 2800 μg and both studies confirmed the bronchodilator effect of AZD9164. However, the first 3 patients in the COPD cohort who received AZD9164 (1000 μg) experienced a transient fall in FEV1 5 to 15 minutes after inhalation of AZD9164 while the patient receiving placebo did not. The study safety review process then resulted in cessation of further activities on AZD9164. Retrospective analysis showed that two healthy subjects had also had transient falls in FEV1 shortly after inhalation of AZD9164 400 and 2800 μg respectively, although neither reported any related respiratory symptoms or other AEs.

conclusionsThese results show that transient paradoxical bronchoconstriction can occur in some healthy subjects, in addition to patients with COPD, following inhalation of AZD9164 and that the citrate buffer used in the nebulised formulation cannot have been the only cause of the drop in FEV1 in previous studies. As preclinical data do not provide an explanation, the reasons for this brief post-dose drop in FEV1 remain unclear. However, these results highlight the importance of monitoring lung function immediately post-dose when investigating novel inhaled treatments, even when a rapid onset of effect is not expected.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01016951 and NCT01096563.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdultBronchial SpasmBronchodilator AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMuscarinic AntagonistsPiperidinesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuinuclidinesRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAZD9164Bronchodilator AgentsMuscarinic AntagonistsPiperidinesQuinuclidines

Identifiers

PMID24669829
PMCPMC3976047
OpenAlexW2026191623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.