Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24669341›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medical and health sciences research2014

Learning from health care workers' opinions for improving quality of neonatal health care in kilimanjaro region, northeast Tanzania.

B Mbwele, Nl Ide, Jg Mrema, Ap Ward Sarah, Ja Melnick, R Manongi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medical and health sciences research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Wellcome open research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

B MbweleKilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, P.O Box 2236, Moshi, Tanzania.
Nl IdeGlobal Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jg MremaKilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, P.O Box 2236, Moshi, Tanzania.
Ap Ward SarahMD Candidate, Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Ja MelnickCellular Biology, Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
R ManongiCommunity Health Department, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, P.O Box 2240, Moshi, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a higher neonatal mortality rate while the adherence to the existing guidelines is rarely studied in Tanzania.

aimThe aim of this study is to assess the performance of health workers for neonatal health-care. MATERIALS AND

methodsSettings - Peripheral health facilities (regional referral, district hospitals and health centers) and a tertiary referral hospital of Kilimanjaro region, Tanzania. Fourteen hospital facilities within all seven districts of the Kilimanjaro region wer involved in this cross-sectional descriptive study. Data were collected for 5 months from 26(th) November, 2010 to 25(th) April, 2011. We analyzed our quantitative data by using STATA v10 (StataCorp, TX, USA) for statistical comparison using Chi-square test to test the difference between the categories and odds ratio (OR) for association between independent and dependent variables.

resultsBirth asphyxia was the most recalled health problem requiring critical care, reported by 27.5% (33/120) of health-care workers (HCWs) at peripheral hospitals and at 46.4% (13/28) in a tertiary referral centers. Majority of HCWs commented on their own performance 47.5% (67/140). In the periphery (40), first comment was on management and follow-up of neonatal cases 47.5% (19/40), second on a need of skills 45% (18/40) and third on timely referrals 7.5% (18/40). Shortage of proper equipment was reported at 26.4% (37/140), shortage of staff was reported at 12.0% (17/140), lack of organization of care 11.4% (16/140) and poor hygiene at 2.9% (4/140). It was hard to judge the impact of training on the sufficiency of knowledge (OR: 2.1; 95% confidence interval: [0.9 - 4.8]; P = 0.08) although levels of knowledge for critical neonatal care were higher at the tertiary referral hospital (Pearson χ(2) [2] = 53.8; P < 0.001).

conclusionPerformance of HCWs in early neonatal care is suboptimal and requires frequent systematic evaluation.

Indexed as

Health care workersKilimanjaroKnowledgeNeonatalNorthern TanzaniaPerformancePeripheral hospitalsQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID24669341
PMCPMC3952280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.