ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2012
Intracervical versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical dilatation prior to operative hysteroscopy-a comparative study.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHysteroscopic surgery requires pre-operative cervical ripening to facilitate adequate dilatation of the cervix for insertion of operative hysteroscope. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of intracervical misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol in achieving cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy.
methodsIn this randomised comparative study conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital, 56 patients needing operative hysteroscopy were divided into two groups of 28 patients, one for intracervical misoprostol and the other for vaginal misoprostol. Four hundred microgram of misoprostol was inserted on the night before and in the morning of operative hysteroscopy intracervically in group I and vaginally in group II.
resultsPrimary outcome measure was number of patients achieving 7 mm preoperative dilatation of cervix. Largest Hegar dilator that could be passed into the uterine cavity past the internal optic sheath without resistance was noted in each case. Mean cervical dilatation prior to operative hysteroscopy was calculated. In addition, incidence of slipping of vulsellum and cervical laceration was also noted. Time to achieve full cervical dilatation was recorded. In 23/28 cases of group I and 5/28 in group II, size 7 Hegar dilator could be passed without effort. Mean cervical dilatation was 7.5 mm in group I and 5.7 mm in group II. Slipping of the vulsellum and cervical lacerations were seen in significantly less patients in group I. Mean time to achieve cervical dilatation to 10 mm was 43.39 seconds in group I and 103.96 seconds in group II (P<0.0001).
conclusionIntracervical administration of misoprostol is an effective method of achieving cervical ripening for easy cervical dilatation up to 10 mm prior to operative hysteroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.