Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24668615›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2014

Dissociable effects of basolateral amygdala lesions on decision making biases in rats when loss or gain is emphasized.

Melanie Tremblay, Paul J Cocker, Jay G Hosking, Fiona D Zeeb, Robert D Rogers, Catharine A Winstanley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sex differences in sensitivity to dopamine receptor manipulations of risk-based decision making in rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. GABANeuropharmacology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Exploring preferences for variable delays over fixed delays to high-value food rewards as a model of food-seeking behaviours in humans.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Understanding Addiction Using Animal Models.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  10. Optogenetic Inhibition Reveals Distinct Roles for Basolateral Amygdala Activity at Discrete Time Points during Risky Decision Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Differential Involvement of the Agranular vs Granular Insular Cortex in the Acquisition and Performance of Choice Behavior in a Rodent Gambling Task.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Article
  17. The basolateral amygdala in reward learning and addiction.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melanie TremblayDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada, melanie.t@psych.ubc.ca.
Paul J Cocker
Jay G Hosking
Fiona D Zeeb
Robert D Rogers
Catharine A Winstanley

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals switch from risk seeking to risk aversion when mathematically identical options are described in terms of loss versus gains, as exemplified in the reflection and framing effects. Determining the neurobiology underlying such cognitive biases could inform our understanding of decision making in health and disease. Although reports vary, data using human subjects have implicated the amygdala in such biases. Animal models enable more detailed investigation of neurobiological mechanisms. We therefore tested whether basolateral amygdala (BLA) lesions would affect risk preference for gains or losses in rats. Choices in both paradigms were always between options of equal expected value-a guaranteed outcome, or the 50:50 chance of double or nothing. In the loss-chasing task, most rats exhibited strong risk seeking preferences, gambling at the risk of incurring double the penalty, regardless of the size of the guaranteed loss. In the betting task, the majority of animals were equivocal in their choice, irrespective of bet size; however, a wager-sensitive subgroup progressively shifted away from the uncertain option as the bet size increased, which is reminiscent of risk aversion. BLA lesions increased preference for the smaller guaranteed loss in the loss-chasing task, without affecting choice on the betting task, which is indicative of reduced risk seeking for losses, but intact risk aversion for gains. These data support the hypothesis that the amygdala plays a more prominent role in choice biases related to losses. Given the importance of the amygdala in representing negative affect, the aversive emotional reaction to loss, rather than aberrant estimations of probability or loss magnitude, may underlie risk seeking for losses.

Indexed as

BiasAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBasolateral Nuclear ComplexBrain InjuriesConditioning, OperantDecision MakingDisease Models, AnimalExploratory BehaviorQuinolinic AcidRatsRats, Long-EvansReaction TimeRewardRisk-TakingQuinolinic Acid

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.