ArticleThe oncologist2014
Cervical cancer-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices of health professionals working in brazil's network of primary care units.
Article in The oncologist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healthcare professionals' communication practices and preparedness in organised human papillomavirus-based cervical Cancer screening: A cross-sectional study in Central Portugal.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- [Cervical cancer screening in Brazil: a coverage analysis using the Brazilian Cancer Information System].Cadernos de saude publica · 2025Article
- [Clinical coordination and strengthening of primary care for cancer diagnosis in Latin America: a scoping reviewCoordenação clínica e fortalecimento da atenção primária no diagnóstico do câncer na América Latina: revisão de escopo].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025Article
- Factors Associated with HPV Knowledge Among Professionals in the City of Francisco Beltrão, Brazil.Journal of community health · 2023Article
- [Control of cervical cancer in the primary care setting in South American countries: systematic reviewControl del cáncer cervicouterino en los servicios de atención primaria de salud en los países de América del Sur: revisión sistemática].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022Review
- Dominican Provider Attitudes Towards HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening and, Current Challenges to Cervical Cancer Prevention in the Dominican Republic: a Mixed Methods Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Article
- Dominican Provider Practices for Cervical Cancer Screening in Santo Domingo and Monte Plata Provinces.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Article
- Functioning in Women with Cervical Cancer in Brazil: the Perspective of Experts.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2018Article
- Breast cancer related perceptions and practices of health professionals working in Brazil's network of primary care units.Preventive medicine · 2018Article
- Screening Cervical Cancer by the Pap Test – Relevance of Age Ranges Recommended by the Brazilian Programme for Prevention and ControlAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2017Article
- Health promoting practices and personal lifestyle behaviors of Brazilian health professionals.BMC public health · 2016Article
- Predictive Capability of HPV and Pap Tests in Screening for Cervical Cancer over a Three-Year Follow-up.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2016Article
- Providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to colorectal cancer control in Brazil.Preventive medicine · 2015Article
- Human papillomavirus (HPV) screening and cervical cancer burden. A Brazilian perspective.Virology journal · 2015Review
- Cervical cancer screening: the complex interplay of medical infrastructure, society, and culture.The oncologist · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBrazil's national strategy for cervical cancer screening includes using the Papanicolaou (Pap) test every 3 years among women aged 25-64 years. Comprehensive primary care services are provided through a network of primary health units, but little is known about cervical cancer-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices among health professionals and coordinators working in these facilities.
methodsIn 2011, we conducted a cross-sectional nationally representative phone survey of 1,600 primary health care units to interview one unit coordinator and one health care professional per unit (either nurse, physician, or community health worker). Responses were obtained from 1,251 coordinators, 182 physicians, 347 nurses, and 273 community health workers. Questionnaires were administered to assess health units' characteristics and capacity for cervical cancer-related services as well as health professionals' perceived effectiveness of the Pap test, preparedness to talk to women about cervical cancer, adherence with screening guidelines, and willingness to recommend human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination to females.
resultsMost units conducted screening (91.9%), used home visits to conduct recruitment and outreach (83.4%), and provided follow-up to women who did not return to discuss Pap test results (88.1%). Approximately 93% of health professionals stated that Pap testing was effective in decreasing death rates from cervical cancer and 65% stated that national guidelines for cervical cancer screening are very influential; 93% of nurses and physicians reported screening women annually and 75% reported beginning to screen women younger than 25 years old. Regarding HPV vaccination, almost 90% of nurses and physicians would recommend the HPV vaccine to their females patients if it were available. A larger proportion of physicians and nurses recommended the HPV vaccine to older girls (13-18 years) and women (19-26 years and even older than 26 years) than to younger girls (12 years or younger).
conclusionAlthough Brazil's network of primary care units has significantly increased access to cervical cancer screening, effective strategies are needed to ensure that women get screened at the appropriate ages and intervals. Additionally, this study's baseline data on HPV vaccination may be useful as Brazil embarks on a national HPV vaccination program in 2014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.