Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24668228›Full record

ReviewThe EMBO journal2014

Role of receptor binding specificity in influenza A virus transmission and pathogenesis.

Miranda de Graaf, Ron A M Fouchier

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The EMBO journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 280 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
280citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

280 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 431 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

220 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miranda de GraafDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ron A M Fouchier
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN266200700010C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent emergence of a novel avian A/H7N9 influenza virus in poultry and humans in China, as well as laboratory studies on adaptation and transmission of avian A/H5N1 influenza viruses, has shed new light on influenza virus adaptation to mammals. One of the biological traits required for animal influenza viruses to cross the species barrier that received considerable attention in animal model studies, in vitro assays, and structural analyses is receptor binding specificity. Sialylated glycans present on the apical surface of host cells can function as receptors for the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) protein. Avian and human influenza viruses typically have a different sialic acid (SA)-binding preference and only few amino acid changes in the HA protein can cause a switch from avian to human receptor specificity. Recent experiments using glycan arrays, virus histochemistry, animal models, and structural analyses of HA have added a wealth of knowledge on receptor binding specificity. Here, we review recent data on the interaction between influenza virus HA and SA receptors of the host, and the impact on virus host range, pathogenesis, and transmission. Remaining challenges and future research priorities are also discussed.

Indexed as

Viral TropismVirus AttachmentAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusHumansInfluenza A virusInfluenza, HumanPolysaccharidesProtein BindingReceptors, VirusSialic AcidsSubstrate SpecificityZoonosesHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusPolysaccharidesReceptors, VirusSialic Acids

Identifiers

PMID24668228
PMCPMC4194109
OpenAlexW2160782249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.