Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24668195›Full record

ReviewMolecular imaging and biology2014

Combined PET/MR: Where are we now? Summary report of the second international workshop on PET/MR imaging April 8-12, 2013, Tubingen, Germany.

Dale L Bailey, Henryk Barthel, Bettina Beuthin-Baumann, Thomas Beyer, Sotirios Bisdas, Ronald Boellaard, Johannes Czernin, Alexander Drzezga, Ulrike Ernemann, Christiane Franzius and 19 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular imaging and biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2015
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. NEMA NU2-2012 performance measurements of the United Imaging uPMR790: an integrated PET/MR system.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  4. Quantitative performance ofEJNMMI physics · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Neurologic Applications of PET/MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2017
    Review
  7. Music-Evoked Emotions-Current Studies.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2017
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Variations in PET/MRI Operations: Results from an International Survey Among 39 Active Sites.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2016
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Do myocardial PET-MR and PET-CT FDG images provide comparable information?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. All-in-one interictal presurgical imaging in patients with epilepsy: single-session EEG/PET/(f)MRI.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Current status and future role of brain PET/MRI in clinical and research settings.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Dale L BaileyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Henryk Barthel
Bettina Beuthin-Baumann
Thomas Beyer
Sotirios Bisdas
Ronald Boellaard
Johannes Czernin
Alexander Drzezga
Ulrike Ernemann
Christiane Franzius
Brigitte Gückel
Rupert Handgretinger
Markus Hartenbach
Dirk Hellwig
Helen Nadel
Stephan G Nekolla
Thomas Pfluger
Bernd J Pichler
Harald H Quick
Osama Sabri
Bernhard Sattler
Jürgen Schäfer
Fritz Schick
Barry A Siegel
Heinz P Schlemmer
Nina F Schwenzer
Jörg van den Hoff
Patrick Veit-Haibach
Hans F Wehrl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This workshop was held a year after the initial positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) workshop in Tübingen, which was recently reported in this journal. The discussions at the 2013 workshop, however, differed substantially from those of the initial workshop, attesting to the progress of combined PET/MR as an innovative imaging modality. Discussions were focused on the search for truly novel, unique clinical and research applications as well as technical issues such as reliable and accurate approaches for attenuation and scatter correction of PET emission data. The workshop provided hands-on experience with PET and MR imaging. In addition, structured and moderated open discussion sessions, including six dialogue boards and two roundtable discussions, provided input from current and future PET/MR imaging users. This summary provides a snapshot of the current achievements and challenges for PET/MR.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.