Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24667861›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2014

Robust mouse pattern electroretinograms derived simultaneously from each eye using a common snout electrode.

Tsung-Han Chou, Jorge Bohorquez, Jonathon Toft-Nielsen, Ozcan Ozdamar, Vittorio Porciatti

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MOGJournal of neuroinflammation · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mouse Model of Glucocorticoid-Induced Glaucoma.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. High-Throughput Binocular Pattern Electroretinograms in the Mouse.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  18. σScientific reports · 2022
    Article
  19. Longitudinal in vivo CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tsung-Han ChouBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.
Jorge Bohorquez
Jonathon Toft-Nielsen
Ozcan Ozdamar
Vittorio Porciatti
University of Miami · US

Funding

Shared Equipment ModuleP30EY014801 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Victor L Perez · 2004 to 2026
$12.2M
RETINAL GANGLION CELL PLASTICITY IN GLAUCOMAR01EY019077 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PORCIATTI, VITTORIO · 2009 to 2015
$2.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014801NEI NIH HHS P30-EY014801NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe recorded pattern electroretinograms (PERGs) simultaneously from each eye in mice using binocular stimulation and a common noncorneal electrode.

methodsThe PERG was derived simultaneously from each eye in 71 ketamine/xylazine anesthetized mice (C57BL/6J, 4 months old) from subcutaneous needles (active, snout; reference, back of the head; ground, root of the tail) in response to contrast-reversal of gratings (0.05 cycles/deg, >95% contrast) generated on two custom-made light-emitting diode (LED) tablets alternating at slight different frequencies (OD, 0.984 Hz; OS, 0.992 Hz). Independent PERG signals from each eye were retrieved using one channel continuous acquisition and phase-locking average (OD, 369 epochs of 492 ms; OS, 372 epochs of 496 ms). The PERG was the average of three consecutive repetitions.

resultsBinocular snout PERGs had high amplitude (mean, 25.3 μV, SD 6.6) and no measurable interocular cross-talk. Responses were reliable (test-retest variability within-session, 14%, SD 7; between sessions, 25%, SD 9; interocular asymmetry within-session, 9%, SD 7; between sessions, 13%, SD 5). Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) were the main source of the binocular snout PERG, as optic nerve crush in three mice abolished the signal.

conclusionsThe PERG, a sensitive measure of RGC function, is used increasingly in mouse models of glaucoma and optic nerve disease. Compared to current methods, the binocular snout PERG represents a substantial improvement in terms of simplicity and speed. It also overcomes limitations of corneal electrodes that interfere with invasive procedures of the eye and facilitates experiments based on comparison between the responses of the two eyes.

Indexed as

ElectrodesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalElectroretinographyGlaucomaMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOptic NerveOptic Nerve DiseasesPhotic StimulationRetinal Ganglion Cellsbioelectric fieldmousenoncorneal electrodepattern electroretinogramretinal ganglion cell

Identifiers

PMID24667861
PMCPMC3993869
OpenAlexW2000182546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.