Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2014
High concordance of protein (by IHC), gene (by FISH; HER2 only), and microarray readout (by TargetPrint) of ER, PgR, and HER2: results from the EORTC 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT trial.
Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00433589 (MINDACT), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
MINDACT (Microarray In Node-Negative and 1 to 3 Positive Lymph Node Disease May Avoid Chemotherapy): A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing the 70-Gene Signature With the Common Clinical-Pathological Criteria in Selecting Patients for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer With 0 to 3 Positive Nodes
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival outcomes in HER2-low versus HER2-zero breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- The value of multigene predictors of clinical outcome in breast cancer: an analysis of the evidence.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2015Pooled it
- Adaptive Randomization of Veliparib-Carboplatin Treatment in Breast Cancer.The New England journal of medicine · 2016Trial
- Adaptive Randomization of Neratinib in Early Breast Cancer.The New England journal of medicine · 2016Trial
- Discordant assessment of tumor biomarkers by histopathological and molecular assays in the EORTC randomized controlled 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT trial breast cancer : Intratumoral heterogeneity and DCIS or normal tissue components are unlikely to be the cause of discordance.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2016Trial
- Predicting immune responsiveness in ER-positive breast cancer for personalized therapy: a population-based study.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Open questions, current challenges, and future perspectives in targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low breast cancer.ESMO open · 2024Review
- HER2-Low Breast Cancer-Diagnostic Challenges and Opportunities for Insights from Ongoing Studies: A Podcast.Targeted oncology · 2023Article
- HER2 mRNA Levels, Estrogen Receptor Activity and Susceptibility to Trastuzumab in Primary Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2022Article
- Correlation of ER, PR, and HER2 at the protein and mRNA levels in Asian patients with operable breast cancer.Bioscience reports · 2022Article
- A DNA Methylation-Based Gene Signature Can Predict Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Diagnosis.Biomedicines · 2021Article
- ZNF703 gene copy number and protein expression in breast cancer; associations with proliferation, prognosis and luminal subtypes.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021Article
- Past, Current, and Future Cancer Clinical Research Collaborations: The Case of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.Clinical and translational science · 2021Review
- Prediction of Breast Cancer Recurrence Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network Without Region-of-Interest Labeling.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Controlling technical variation amongst 6693 patient microarrays of the randomized MINDACT trial.Communications biology · 2020Article
- Clinical validation of Ki67 by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2019Article
- EvaluatingOpen access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2018Article
- Concordance between Immunohistochemistry and Microarray Gene Expression Profiling for Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2 Receptor Statuses in Breast Cancer Patients in Lebanon.International journal of breast cancer · 2018Article
- Clinical Value of RNA Sequencing-Based Classifiers for Prediction of the Five Conventional Breast Cancer Biomarkers: A Report From the Population-Based Multicenter Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast Initiative.JCO precision oncology · 2018Article
- Her2 assessment using quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction reliably identifies Her2 overexpression without amplification in breast cancer cases.Journal of translational medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the correlation of TargetPrint with local and central immunohistochemistry/fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PgR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in the first 800 patients enrolled in the MINDACT trial. PATIENTS AND
methodsData from local (N = 800) and central (N = 626) assessments of receptor status were collected and compared with TargetPrint results.
resultsFor ER, the positive agreement (the percentage of central pathology positive assessments that were also TargetPrint/local laboratory positive) for TargetPrint in comparison to centralized assessment was 98% with a negative agreement (the percentage of central pathology negative assessments that were also TargetPrint/local laboratory negative) of 96%. For PgR, the positive agreement was 83% with a negative agreement of 92%. For HER2, the positive agreement was 75% with a negative agreement of 99%. Even though the local assessment showed higher positive agreement for PgR (89%) and higher positive agreement for HER2 (85%), the range of discordant local versus central assessments were as high as 6.7% for ER, 12.9% for PgR, and 4.3% for HER2.
conclusionTargetPrint and local assessment of ER, PgR, and HER2 show high concordance with central assessment in the first 800 MINDACT patients. However, there are concerns about the higher discordance rates for some local sites. TargetPrint can improve the reliability of hormone receptor and HER2 testing for those centers with a lower rate of concordance with the reference laboratory, with the limitation of a positive agreement of 75% for HER2. TargetPrint consequently has important implications for treatment decisions in clinical practice and is a reliable alternative to local assessment for ER. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: NCT00433589.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.