Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24667714›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2014

High concordance of protein (by IHC), gene (by FISH; HER2 only), and microarray readout (by TargetPrint) of ER, PgR, and HER2: results from the EORTC 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT trial.

G Viale, L Slaets, J Bogaerts, E Rutgers, L Van't Veer, M J Piccart-Gebhart, F A de Snoo, L Stork-Sloots, L Russo, P Dell'Orto and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00433589 (MINDACT), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00433589 phase3completednot on this map

MINDACT (Microarray In Node-Negative and 1 to 3 Positive Lymph Node Disease May Avoid Chemotherapy): A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing the 70-Gene Signature With the Common Clinical-Pathological Criteria in Selecting Patients for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer With 0 to 3 Positive Nodes

TypeinterventionalSponsorEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCRan2007 to 2020Enrolled6,600ConditionsBreast CancerArmsanthracycline-based, docetaxel and capecitabine, tamoxifen, Letrozole
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Adaptive Randomization of Neratinib in Early Breast Cancer.The New England journal of medicine · 2016
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. EvaluatingOpen access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

G VialeDepartment of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: giuseppe.viale@ieo.it.
L SlaetsDepartment of Statistics, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
J BogaertsDepartment of Statistics, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
E RutgersDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
L Van't VeerDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Research and Development, Agendia, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M J Piccart-GebhartDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
F A de SnooMedical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
L Stork-SlootsMedical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
L RussoDepartment of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
P Dell'OrtoDepartment of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
J van den AkkerResearch and Development, Agendia, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A GlasResearch and Development, Agendia, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
F CardosoBreast Unit, Champalimaud Cancer Center, Lisbon, Portugal.
TRANSBIG Consortium & the MINDACT Investigators
Agendia (Netherlands) · NLUniversity of Milan · ITEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · BEChampalimaud Foundation · PTInstitut Jules Bordet · BEThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 7714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate the correlation of TargetPrint with local and central immunohistochemistry/fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PgR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in the first 800 patients enrolled in the MINDACT trial. PATIENTS AND

methodsData from local (N = 800) and central (N = 626) assessments of receptor status were collected and compared with TargetPrint results.

resultsFor ER, the positive agreement (the percentage of central pathology positive assessments that were also TargetPrint/local laboratory positive) for TargetPrint in comparison to centralized assessment was 98% with a negative agreement (the percentage of central pathology negative assessments that were also TargetPrint/local laboratory negative) of 96%. For PgR, the positive agreement was 83% with a negative agreement of 92%. For HER2, the positive agreement was 75% with a negative agreement of 99%. Even though the local assessment showed higher positive agreement for PgR (89%) and higher positive agreement for HER2 (85%), the range of discordant local versus central assessments were as high as 6.7% for ER, 12.9% for PgR, and 4.3% for HER2.

conclusionTargetPrint and local assessment of ER, PgR, and HER2 show high concordance with central assessment in the first 800 MINDACT patients. However, there are concerns about the higher discordance rates for some local sites. TargetPrint can improve the reliability of hormone receptor and HER2 testing for those centers with a lower rate of concordance with the reference laboratory, with the limitation of a positive agreement of 75% for HER2. TargetPrint consequently has important implications for treatment decisions in clinical practice and is a reliable alternative to local assessment for ER. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: NCT00433589.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMicroarray AnalysisMiddle AgedPrognosisProtein BiosynthesisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRNA, MessengerStatistics as TopicBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRNA, Messengerbreast cancerconcordanceFISHhormone receptorIHCTargetPrint

Identifiers

PMID24667714
PMCPMC3969556
OpenAlexW2132894311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.