Is virology dead?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Modifying the antiviral innate immune response by selective writing, erasing, and reading of mCell chemical biology · 2024
   Review
2. Next-Generation Sequencing for Confronting Virus Pandemics.Viruses · 2022
   Review
3. SARS-CoV-2: from its discovery to genome structure, transcription, and replication.Cell & bioscience · 2021
   Review
4. The high-resolution structure of a UDP-L-rhamnose synthase from Acanthamoeba polyphaga Mimivirus.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2020
   Article
5. Beyond cells - The virome in the human holobiont.Microbial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2019
   Review
6. 2016 International meeting of the Global Virus Network.Antiviral research · 2017
   Article
7. Insights into antiviral innate immunity revealed by studying hepatitis C virus.Cytokine · 2015
   Review
8. The importance of virology at a time of great need and great jeopardy.mBio · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as