Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24667536›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Two enhancers control transcription of Drosophila muscleblind in the embryonic somatic musculature and in the central nervous system.

Ariadna Bargiela, Beatriz Llamusi, Estefanía Cerro-Herreros, Ruben Artero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Increased Muscleblind levels by chloroquine treatment improve myotonic dystrophy type 1 phenotypes in in vitro and in vivo models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  7. Deterministic splicing ofScience advances · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. GeneHancer: genome-wide integration of enhancers and target genes in GeneCards.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ariadna BargielaTranslational Genomics Group, Department of Genetics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Beatriz LlamusiTranslational Genomics Group, Department of Genetics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Estefanía Cerro-HerrerosTranslational Genomics Group, Department of Genetics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Ruben ArteroTranslational Genomics Group, Department of Genetics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
INCLIVA Health Research Institute · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phylogenetically conserved family of Muscleblind proteins are RNA-binding factors involved in a variety of gene expression processes including alternative splicing regulation, RNA stability and subcellular localization, and miRNA biogenesis, which typically contribute to cell-type specific differentiation. In humans, sequestration of Muscleblind-like proteins MBNL1 and MBNL2 has been implicated in degenerative disorders, particularly expansion diseases such as myotonic dystrophy type 1 and 2. Drosophila muscleblind was previously shown to be expressed in embryonic somatic and visceral muscle subtypes, and in the central nervous system, and to depend on Mef2 for transcriptional activation. Genomic approaches have pointed out candidate gene promoters and tissue-specific enhancers, but experimental confirmation of their regulatory roles was lacking. In our study, luciferase reporter assays in S2 cells confirmed that regions P1 (515 bp) and P2 (573 bp), involving the beginning of exon 1 and exon 2, respectively, were able to initiate RNA transcription. Similarly, transgenic Drosophila embryos carrying enhancer reporter constructs supported the existence of two regulatory regions which control embryonic expression of muscleblind in the central nerve cord (NE, neural enhancer; 830 bp) and somatic (skeletal) musculature (ME, muscle enhancer; 3.3 kb). Both NE and ME were able to boost expression from the Hsp70 heterologous promoter. In S2 cell assays most of the ME enhancer activation could be further narrowed down to a 1200 bp subregion (ME.3), which contains predicted binding sites for the Mef2 transcription factor. The present study constitutes the first characterization of muscleblind enhancers and will contribute to a deeper understanding of the transcriptional regulation of the gene.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalTranscription, GeneticAnimalsBase SequenceCentral Nervous SystemConserved SequenceDrosophilaEnhancer Elements, GeneticGenes, ReporterGenomicsHumansMolecular Sequence DataMusclesOrgan SpecificityPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA-Binding ProteinsMBNL1 protein, humanRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24667536
PMCPMC3965525
OpenAlexW2091951000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.