Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24667482›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

NIMEFI: gene regulatory network inference using multiple ensemble feature importance algorithms.

Joeri Ruyssinck, Vân Anh Huynh-Thu, Pierre Geurts, Tom Dhaene, Piet Demeester, Yvan Saeys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Calculating Enzyme Inhibition with Random Forests.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phosphoproteomics data-driven signalling network inference: Does it work?Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. FINET: Fast Inferring NETwork.BMC research notes · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joeri RuyssinckDepartment of Information Technology, Ghent University - iMinds, Gent, Belgium.
Vân Anh Huynh-ThuDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science & GIGA-R, Systems and Modeling, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Pierre GeurtsDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science & GIGA-R, Systems and Modeling, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Tom DhaeneDepartment of Information Technology, Ghent University - iMinds, Gent, Belgium.
Piet DemeesterDepartment of Information Technology, Ghent University - iMinds, Gent, Belgium.
Yvan SaeysLaboratory of Immunoregulation, VIB Inflammation Research Center, Gent, Belgium; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the long-standing open challenges in computational systems biology is the topology inference of gene regulatory networks from high-throughput omics data. Recently, two community-wide efforts, DREAM4 and DREAM5, have been established to benchmark network inference techniques using gene expression measurements. In these challenges the overall top performer was the GENIE3 algorithm. This method decomposes the network inference task into separate regression problems for each gene in the network in which the expression values of a particular target gene are predicted using all other genes as possible predictors. Next, using tree-based ensemble methods, an importance measure for each predictor gene is calculated with respect to the target gene and a high feature importance is considered as putative evidence of a regulatory link existing between both genes. The contribution of this work is twofold. First, we generalize the regression decomposition strategy of GENIE3 to other feature importance methods. We compare the performance of support vector regression, the elastic net, random forest regression, symbolic regression and their ensemble variants in this setting to the original GENIE3 algorithm. To create the ensemble variants, we propose a subsampling approach which allows us to cast any feature selection algorithm that produces a feature ranking into an ensemble feature importance algorithm. We demonstrate that the ensemble setting is key to the network inference task, as only ensemble variants achieve top performance. As second contribution, we explore the effect of using rankwise averaged predictions of multiple ensemble algorithms as opposed to only one. We name this approach NIMEFI (Network Inference using Multiple Ensemble Feature Importance algorithms) and show that this approach outperforms all individual methods in general, although on a specific network a single method can perform better. An implementation of NIMEFI has been made publicly available.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, GeneticGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory Networks

Identifiers

PMID24667482
PMCPMC3965471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.