Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24667343›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Validity of electronically administered Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) in ten European countries.

Rajna Golubic, Anne M May, Kristin Benjaminsen Borch, Kim Overvad, Marie-Aline Charles, Maria Jose Tormo Diaz, Pilar Amiano, Domenico Palli, Elisavet Valanou, Matthaeus Vigl and 4 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02341690 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of Smartphone Delivered Interval Walking Training on Physical Activity and Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial - Part of The InterWalk Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CopenhagenRan2015 to 2017Enrolled226ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsInterval walking training, control
NCT05625828 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Effects of a Cognitive-Motor Fall Prevention Program "SILVER XIII - EQUILIBRE" on Fall Risk Factors: Functional Abilities and Executive Functions

TypeinterventionalSponsorEZUS-LYON 1Ran2022 to 2025Enrolled176ConditionsAccidental Falls, Aging, Mild Cognitive ImpairmentArmsCognitive-motor Physical Activity, Multifactorial Physical Activity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rajna GolubicMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Anne M MayJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kristin Benjaminsen BorchDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Kim OvervadSection for Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark and Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Marie-Aline CharlesInserm, Centre for research in Epidemiology and Population Health, U1018, Lifelong epidemiology of obesity, diabètes and chronic renal disease Team, F-94807, Villejuif, France; Univ Paris-Sud, UMRS 1018, F-94807, Villejuif, France.
Maria Jose Tormo DiazDepartment of Epidemiology, Murcia Regional Health Authority, Murcia, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; Department Sociosanitary Sciences, Murcia School of Medicine, Murcia, Spain.
Pilar AmianoSubdirección de Salud Pública de Gipuzkoa, Gobierno Vasco, San Sebastian, Spain.
Domenico PalliMolecular and Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, ISPO, Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Florence, Italy.
Elisavet ValanouHellenic Health Foundation (HHF), Athens, Greece.
Matthaeus ViglDepartment of Epidemiology, Deutsches Institut für Ernährungsforschung Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Nuthetal, Germany.
Paul W FranksDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Genetic & Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Genetic Epidemiology & Clinical Research Group, Department of Public Health & Clinical Medicine, Section for Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Nicholas WarehamMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ulf EkelundMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Soren BrageMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U106179471Medical Research Council MC_U106179473Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the validity of the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) which assesses physical activity (PA) in 4 domains (leisure, work, commuting, home) during past month.

methods580 men and 1343 women from 10 European countries attended 2 visits at which PA energy expenditure (PAEE), time at moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and sedentary time were measured using individually-calibrated combined heart-rate and movement sensing. At the second visit, RPAQ was administered electronically. Validity was assessed using agreement analysis.

resultsRPAQ significantly underestimated PAEE in women [median(IQR): 34.9 (22.3, 52.8) vs. 40.6 (32.4, 50.9) kJ/kg/day, 95%LoA: -44.4, 66.1 kJ/kg/day) and overestimated PAEE in men [45.9 (30.6, 71.1) vs. 45.5 (34.1, 57.6) kJ/kg/day, 95%LoA: -44.8, 102.6 kJ/kg/day]. Using individualised definition of 1MET, RPAQ significantly underestimated MVPA in women [median(IQR): 63.7 (30.5, 126.9) vs. 73.6 (47.8, 107.2) min/day, 95%LoA: -127.4, 311.9 min/day] and overestimated MVPA in men [90.0 (42.3, 188.6) vs. 83.3 (55.1, 125.0) min/day, 95%LoA: -134.8, 427.3 min/day]. Correlations (95%CI) between subjective and objective estimates were statistically significant [PAEE: women, rho = 0.20 (0.15-0.26); men, rho = 0.37 (0.30-0.44); MVPA: women, rho = 0.18 (0.13-0.24); men, rho = 0.31 (0.24-0.38)]. When using non-individualised definition of 1MET (3.5 mlO2/kg/min), MVPA was substantially overestimated (16 min/day, and 32 min/day in women and men, respectively). Revisiting occupational intensity assumptions in questionnaire estimation algorithms with occupational group-level empirical distributions reduced median PAEE-bias in manual (38.8 kJ/kg/day vs. 6.8 kJ/kg/day, p<0.001) and heavy manual workers (63.6 vs. -2.8 kJ/kg/day, p<0.001) in an independent hold-out sample [corrected].

conclusionRelative validity of RPAQ-derived PAEE and MVPA is comparable to previous studies but underestimation of PAEE is smaller. Electronic RPAQ may be used in large-scale epidemiological studies including surveys, providing information on all domains of PA.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismMotor ActivitySurveys and QuestionnairesAdultEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24667343
PMCPMC3965465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.