Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24667241›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

Highly dynamic animal contact network and implications on disease transmission.

Shi Chen, Brad J White, Michael W Sanderson, David E Amrine, Amiyaal Ilany, Cristina Lanzas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The contribution of movement to social network structure and spreading dynamics under simple and complex transmission.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shi ChenDepartment of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.
Brad J WhiteDepartments of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.
Michael W SandersonDepartments of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.
David E AmrineDepartments of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.
Amiyaal IlanyNational Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, Knoxville, TN 37996.
Cristina Lanzas1] Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 [2] National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contact patterns among hosts are considered as one of the most critical factors contributing to unequal pathogen transmission. Consequently, networks have been widely applied in infectious disease modeling. However most studies assume static network structure due to lack of accurate observation and appropriate analytic tools. In this study we used high temporal and spatial resolution animal position data to construct a high-resolution contact network relevant to infectious disease transmission. The animal contact network aggregated at hourly level was highly variable and dynamic within and between days, for both network structure (network degree distribution) and individual rank of degree distribution in the network (degree order). We integrated network degree distribution and degree order heterogeneities with a commonly used contact-based, directly transmitted disease model to quantify the effect of these two sources of heterogeneity on the infectious disease dynamics. Four conditions were simulated based on the combination of these two heterogeneities. Simulation results indicated that disease dynamics and individual contribution to new infections varied substantially among these four conditions under both parameter settings. Changes in the contact network had a greater effect on disease dynamics for pathogens with smaller basic reproduction number (i.e. R0 < 2).

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAnimalsCommunicable DiseasesComputer SimulationDisease OutbreaksHost-Parasite InteractionsModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID24667241
PMCPMC3966050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.