Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24667018›Full record

ArticleApplied nursing research : ANR2014

Strategies to enhance participant recruitment and retention in research involving a community-based population.

Marjorie C McCullagh, Marie-Anne Sanon, Michael A Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied nursing research : ANR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Withdrawal reasons of randomized controlled trials on type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Perceptions and attitudes to clinical research participation in Qatar.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2017
    Article
  9. Recruitment and retention of pregnant women into clinical research trials: an overview of challenges, facilitators, and best practices.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marjorie C McCullaghOccupational Health Nursing Program University of Michigan School, of Nursing, 400N. Ingalls Street room 3182, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA 48019. Electronic address: mcculla@med.umich.edu.
Marie-Anne SanonUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls Street room 3175, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109-5482. Electronic address: sanon@umich.edu.
Michael A CohenOccupational Health Nursing Program University of Michigan School, of Nursing, 400N. Ingalls Street room 3182, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA 48019. Electronic address: miccohen@med.umich.edu.

Funding

Health Promotion/Risk Reduction Interventions with Vulnerable PopulationsT32NR007073 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI VILLARRUEL, ANTONIA M. · 1992 to 2012
$4.1M
Effectiveness of an Intervention to Prevent Hearing Loss Among FarmersR01DC010827 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MCCULLAGH, MARJORIE E · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010827NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC01082703NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Challenges associated with recruiting and retaining community-based populations in research studies have been recognized yet remain of major concern for researchers. There is a need for exchange of recruitment and retention techniques that inform recruitment and retention strategies. Here, the authors discuss a variety of methods that were successful in exceeding target recruitment and retention goals in a randomized clinical trial of hearing protector use among farm operators. Recruitment and retention strategies were 1) based on a philosophy of mutually beneficial engagement in the research process, 2) culturally appropriate, 3) tailored to the unique needs of partnering agencies, and 4) developed and refined in a cyclical and iterative process. Sponsoring organizations are interested in cost-effective recruitment and retention strategies, particularly relating to culturally and ethnically diverse groups. These approaches may result in enhanced subject recruitment and retention, concomitant containment of study costs, and timely accomplishment of study aims.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHumansClinical trialsFarmersNoise induced hearing lossRecruitmentRetention

Identifiers

PMID24667018
PMCPMC4147021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.