ArticleCritical care (London, England)2014
The consequences of sudden fluid shifts on body composition in critically ill patients.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Nutritional Care Through Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Critical Patients.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Changes in body composition of burn patients during the phases of response to trauma.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2023Observational
- Attenuating Muscle Mass Loss in Critical Illness: the Role of Nutrition and Exercise.Current osteoporosis reports · 2022Review
- Bioelectric impedance analysis for body composition measurement and other potential clinical applications in critical illness.Current opinion in critical care · 2021Review
- Extracellular Water to Total Body Water Ratio in Septic Shock Patients Receiving Protocol-Driven Resuscitation Bundle Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Fluid balance and phase angle as assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis in critically ill patients: a multicenter prospective cohort study.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2020Observational
- Bio-electrical impedance analysis in critically ill patients: are we ready for prime time?Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Article
- Improving Medication Dosing in the Obese Patient.Clinical drug investigation · 2017Article
- Hypotension and hypovolemia during hemodialysis: is the usual suspect innocent?Critical care (London, England) · 2016Article
- Article
- Body cell mass evaluation in critically ill patients: killing two birds with one stone.Critical care (London, England) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEstimation of body composition as fat-free mass (FFM) is subjected to many variations caused by injury and stress conditions in the intensive care unit (ICU). Body cell mass (BCM), the metabolically active part of FFM, is reported to be more specifically correlated to changes in nutritional status. Bedside estimation of BCM could help to provide more valuable markers of nutritional status and may promote understanding of metabolic consequences of energy deficit in the ICU patients. We aimed to quantify BCM, water compartments and FFM by methods usable at the bedside for evaluating the impact of sudden and massive fluid shifts on body composition in ICU patients.
methodsWe conducted a prospective experimental study over an 6 month-period in a 18-bed ICU. Body composition of 31 consecutive hemodynamically stable patients requiring acute renal replacement therapy for fluid overload (ultrafiltration ≥5% body weight) was investigated before and after the hemodialysis session. Intra-(ICW) and extracellular (ECW) water volumes were calculated from the raw values of the low- and high-frequency resistances measured by multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance. BCM was assessed by a calculated method recently developed for ICU patients. FFM was derived from BCM and ECW.
resultsIntradialytic weight loss was 3.8 ± 0.8 kg. Percentage changes of ECW (-7.99 ± 4.60%) and of ICW (-7.63 ± 5.11%) were similar, resulting ECW/ICW ratio constant (1.26 ± 0.20). The fall of FFM (-2.24 ± 1.56 kg, -4.43 ± 2.65%) was less pronounced than the decrease of ECW (P < 0.001) or ICW (P < 0.001). Intradialytic variation of BCM was clinically negligible (-0.38 ± 0.93 kg, -1.56 ± 3.94%) and was significantly less than FFM (P < 0.001).
conclusionsBCM estimation is less driven by sudden massive fluid shifts than FMM. Assessment of BCM should be preferred to FFM when severe hydration disturbances are present in ICU patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.