Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24666591›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2014

Thrombolysis ImPlementation in Stroke (TIPS): evaluating the effectiveness of a strategy to increase the adoption of best evidence practice--protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial in acute stroke care.

Christine L Paul, Christopher R Levi, Catherine A D'Este, Mark W Parsons, Christopher F Bladin, Richard I Lindley, John R Attia, Frans Henskens, Erin Lalor, Mark Longworth and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Audit as a Tool for Improving the Quality of Stroke Care: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The new challenge for improving psychosocial cancer care: shifting to a system-based approach.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Christine L PaulThe University of Newcastle, (UoN) University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. chris.paul@newcastle.edu.au.
Christopher R Levi
Catherine A D'Este
Mark W Parsons
Christopher F Bladin
Richard I Lindley
John R Attia
Frans Henskens
Erin Lalor
Mark Longworth
Sandy Middleton
Annika Ryan
Erin Kerr
Robert W Sanson-Fisher
Thrombolysis ImPlementation in Stroke (TIPS) Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke is a leading cause of death and disability internationally. One of the three effective interventions in the acute phase of stroke care is thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), if given within 4.5 hours of onset to appropriate cases of ischaemic stroke.

objectivesTo test the effectiveness of a multi-component multidisciplinary collaborative approach compared to usual care as a strategy for increasing thrombolysis rates for all stroke patients at intervention hospitals, while maintaining accepted benchmarks for low rates of intracranial haemorrhage and high rates of functional outcomes for both groups at three months. METHODS AND

designA cluster randomised controlled trial of 20 hospitals across 3 Australian states with 2 groups: multi- component multidisciplinary collaborative intervention as the experimental group and usual care as the control group. The intervention is based on behavioural theory and analysis of the steps, roles and barriers relating to rapid assessment for thrombolysis eligibility; it involves a comprehensive range of strategies addressing individual-level and system-level change at each site. The primary outcome is the difference in tPA rates between the two groups post-intervention. The secondary outcome is the proportion of tPA treated patients in both groups with good functional outcomes (modified Rankin Score (mRS <2) and the proportion with intracranial haemorrhage (mRS ≥2), compared to international benchmarks. DISCUSSION: TIPS will trial a comprehensive, multi-component and multidisciplinary collaborative approach to improving thrombolysis rates at multiple sites. The trial has the potential to identify methods for optimal care which can be implemented for stroke patients during the acute phase. Study findings will include barriers and solutions to effective thrombolysis implementation and trial outcomes will be published whether significant or not.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613000939796.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherencePractice Guidelines as TopicAspirinAustraliaCooperative BehaviorDiffusion of InnovationEmergency Medical ServicesEvidence-Based MedicineFibrinolytic AgentsHumansPatient Care TeamQuality of Health CareResearch DesignStrokeThrombolytic TherapyTissue Plasminogen ActivatorAspirinFibrinolytic AgentsTissue Plasminogen Activator

Identifiers

PMID24666591
PMCPMC4016636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.