Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24666451›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie2014

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a review.

Behrouz Heidary, Terry P Phang, Manoj J Raval, Carl J Brown

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Contemporary management of rectal cancer.Surgery open science · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: exploring its indications and novel applications. A narrative review.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evolution of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Transanal Approach to Rectal Polyps and Cancer.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2016
    Review
  20. Local excision by transanal endoscopic surgery.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Behrouz HeidaryThe Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
Terry P PhangThe Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
Manoj J RavalThe Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
Carl J BrownThe Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
St. Paul's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectal adenomas and cancers occur frequently. Small adenomas can be removed colonoscopically, whereas larger polyps are removed via conventional transanal excision. Owing to technical difficulties, adenomas of the mid- and upper rectum require radical resection. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was first designed as an alternative treatment for these lesions. However, since its development TEM has been also used for a variety of rectal lesions, including carcinoids, rectal prolapse and diverticula, early stage carcinomas and palliative resection of rectal cancers. The objective of this review is to describe the current status of TEM in the treatment of rectal lesions. Since the 1980s, TEM has advanced substantially. With low recurrence rates, it is the method of choice for resection of endoscopically unresectable adenomas. Some studies have shown benefits to its use in treating early T1 rectal cancers compared with radical surgery in select patients. However, for more advanced rectal cancers TEM should be considered palliative or experimental. This technique has also been shown to be safe for the treatment of other uncommon rectal tumours, such as carcinoids. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery may allow for new strategies in the treatment of rectal pathology where technical limitations of transanal techniques have limited endoluminal surgical innovations.

Indexed as

MicrosurgeryNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryProctoscopyAnal CanalColonic NeoplasmsHumansRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID24666451
PMCPMC3968206
OpenAlexW2032919171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.