Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24665863›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2014

Detergent optimized membrane protein reconstitution in liposomes for solid state NMR.

Dylan T Murray, James Griffin, Timothy A Cross

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dylan T MurrayInstitute for Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University , 91 Chieftan Way, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, United States.
James Griffin
Timothy A Cross
Florida State University · US

Funding

Target IdentificationP01AI074805 · NIAID · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CROSS, TIMOTHY A · 2009 to 2013
$8.7M
Four Mtb Membrane Proteins: Structure and FunctionR01AI073891 · NIAID · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CROSS, TIMOTHY A · 2008 to 2012
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI074805NIAID NIH HHS P01-AI074805NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI073891NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI073891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For small helical membrane proteins, their structures are highly sensitive to their environment, and solid state NMR is a structural technique that can characterize these membrane proteins in native-like lipid bilayers and proteoliposomes. To date, a systematic method by which to evaluate the effect of the solubilizing detergent on proteoliposome preparations for solid state NMR of membrane proteins has not been presented in the literature. A set of experiments are presented aimed at determining the conditions most amenable to dialysis mediated reconstitution sample preparation. A membrane protein from M. tuberculosis is used to illustrate the method. The results show that a detergent that stabilizes the most protein is not always ideal and sometimes cannot be removed by dialysis. By focusing on the lipid and protein binding properties of the detergent, proteoliposome preparations can be readily produced, which provide double the signal-to-noise ratios for both the oriented sample and magic angle spinning solid state NMR. The method will allow more membrane protein drug targets to be structurally characterized in lipid bilayer environments.

Indexed as

LiposomesChromatography, GelCircular DichroismDetergentsElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelLipid BilayersMembrane ProteinsMicellesNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularDetergentsLipid BilayersLiposomesMembrane ProteinsMicelles

Identifiers

PMID24665863
PMCPMC4004220
OpenAlexW2316344620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.