ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2011
Probabilistic method for context-sensitive detection of polyps in CT colonography.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Radiologists can outperform computer-aided detection (CAD) systems for CT colonography, because they consider not only local characteristics but also the context of findings. In particular, isolated findings are considered as more suspicious than clustered ones. We developed a computational method to model this problem-solving technique for reducing false-positive (FP) CAD detections in CT colonography. Lesion likelihood was estimated from shape and texture features of each candidate detection by use of a Bayesian neural network. Context features were calculated to characterize the distribution of candidate detections in a local neighborhood. A belief network was applied to detect isolated candidates at a higher sensitivity than clustered ones. The detection performances of the context-sensitive CAD and a conventional CAD were compared by use of leave-one-patient-out evaluation on 73 patients. Conventional CAD detected 82% of the lesions 6 - 9 mm in size with a median of 6 false positives per CT scan, whereas context-sensitive CAD detected the lesions at a median of 4 false positives with significant increment in overall detection performance. For lesions ≥10 mm in size, the detection sensitivity was 98% with a median of 7 false positives per patient, but the improvement in detection performance was not significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.