ArticleFamilial cancer2014
Two Chinese pedigrees for adenomatous polyposis coli: new mutations at codon 1309 and predisposition to phenotypic variations.
Article in Familial cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mutational screening through comprehensive bioinformatics analysis to detect novel germline mutations in the APC gene in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021Article
- Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Gene Mutations in 22 Chinese Pedigrees with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019Article
- A novel APC mutation identified in a large Chinese family with familial adenomatous polyposis and a brief literature review.Molecular medicine reports · 2018Article
- Novel mutations and phenotypic associations identified through APC, MUTYH, NTHL1, POLD1, POLE gene analysis in Indian Familial Adenomatous Polyposis cohort.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Identification a nonsense mutation ofExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant inherited disease caused by a mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene. Some studies have attempted to correlate mutations at codon 1309 with classic FAP (≥100 colorectal polyps). We report two Chinese FAP pedigrees with new frameshift mutations at codon 1309, in which affected individuals manifest phenotypic variations. Comprehensive physical examinations were performed for all living individuals and the medical data of deceased patients were collected. Screening of the APC and human mutY homolog (MUTYH) genes for germline mutations was conducted by direct polymerase chain reaction (PCR) sequencing. In two pedigrees, a heterozygous deletion in exon 16 of the APC gene was present in all FAP patients but absent in the unaffected individuals. There were no changes to the MUTYH gene. The first pedigree, with a new frameshift mutation at c.3926_3930 del AAAAG (p. Glu1309Aspfs X4), exhibited obvious differences in the polyp number such that the proband manifested only three colorectal polyps, whereas another patients showed the symptoms of classic FAP. The second pedigree, also traced a new mutation at c.3922_3925 del AAAG (p. Glu1309Argfs X11). Although all of the patients presented with classic polyposis, one of them exhibited a delayed onset of colorectal cancer in his 50s. Two novel mutations at codon 1309 in two Chinese families suffering from FAP could enrich the germline mutation spectrum of the APC gene. Families of individuals might manifest different phenotypes, even with an identical codon 1309 mutation, unlike in previous studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.