Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24664432›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2014

Comparative myogenesis in teleosts and mammals.

Giuliana Rossi, Graziella Messina

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Trunk Muscle Differentiation and Growth in Vertebrates.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Skeletal Muscle Aging: Lessons From Teleosts.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Regulatory Role ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giuliana RossiDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Graziella Messina
University of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeletal myogenesis has been and is currently under extensive study in both mammals and teleosts, with the latter providing a good model for skeletal myogenesis because of their flexible and conserved genome. Parallel investigations of muscle studies using both these models have strongly accelerated the advances in the field. However, when transferring the knowledge from one model to the other, it is important to take into account both their similarities and differences. The main difficulties in comparing mammals and teleosts arise from their different temporal development. Conserved aspects can be seen for muscle developmental origin and segmentation, and for the presence of multiple myogenic waves. Among the divergences, many fish have an indeterminate growth capacity throughout their entire life span, which is absent in mammals, thus implying different post-natal growth mechanisms. This review covers the current state of the art on myogenesis, with a focus on the most conserved and divergent aspects between mammals and teleosts.

Indexed as

Muscle DevelopmentAnimalsHumansMammalsMuscle, SkeletalRegenerationZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID24664432
PMCPMC4111864
OpenAlexW2081296105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.