Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24664281›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The role of muscle microRNAs in repairing the neuromuscular junction.

Gregorio Valdez, Mary P Heyer, Guoping Feng, Joshua R Sanes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Cellular and Molecular Signature of ALS in Muscle.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Response of plasma microRNAs to nusinersen treatment in patients with SMA.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. An Emerging Role for Epigenetics in Cerebral Palsy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gregorio ValdezDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America; Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia, United States of America.
Mary P HeyerDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America; Department of Molecular Therapeutics, The Scripps Research Institute Florida, Jupiter, Florida, United States of America.
Guoping FengDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America; McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Joshua R SanesDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Duke University Hospital · USHarvard University · USScripps Research Institute · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

Basic Predoctoral Training in NeuroscienceT32GM008441 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCNAMARA, JAMES O. · 1992 to 2017
$4.4M
Cellular and Molecular Analysis of Defects at Aging Neuromuscular SynapsesR01AG032322 · NIA · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI LICHTMAN, JEFF W, SANES, JOSHUA R · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG032322NIA NIH HHS R01AG032322NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

microRNAs have been implicated in mediating key aspects of skeletal muscle development and responses to diseases and injury. Recently, we demonstrated that a synaptically enriched microRNA, miR-206, functions to promote maintenance and repair of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ); in mutant mice lacking miR-206, reinnervation is impaired following nerve injury and loss of NMJs is accelerated in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Here, we asked whether other microRNAs play similar roles. One attractive candidate is miR-133b because it is in the same transcript that encodes miR-206. Like miR-206, miR-133b is concentrated near NMJs and induced after denervation. In miR-133b null mice, however, NMJ development is unaltered, reinnervation proceeds normally following nerve injury, and disease progression is unaffected in the SOD1(G93A) mouse model of ALS. To determine if miR-206 compensates for the loss of miR-133b, we generated mice lacking both microRNAs. The phenotype of these double mutants resembled that of miR-206 single mutants. Finally, we used conditional mutants of Dicer, an enzyme required for the maturation of most microRNAs, to generate mice in which microRNAs were depleted from skeletal muscle fibers postnatally, thus circumventing a requirement for microRNAs in embryonic muscle development. Reinnervation of muscle fibers following injury was impaired in these mice, but the defect was similar in magnitude to that observed in miR-206 mutants. Together, these results suggest that miR-206 is the major microRNA that regulates repair of the NMJ following nerve injury.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMiceMice, KnockoutMicroRNAsMuscle, SkeletalNeuromuscular JunctionSuperoxide DismutaseSuperoxide Dismutase-1MicroRNAsMIRN133 microRNA, ratMirn206 microRNA, mouseSOD1 G93A proteinSod1 protein, mouseSod1 protein, ratSuperoxide DismutaseSuperoxide Dismutase-1

Identifiers

PMID24664281
PMCPMC3963997
OpenAlexW2016003415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.