Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24663983›Full record

ArticleOptics express2014

Correction of optical absorption and scattering variations in Laser Speckle Rheology measurements.

Zeinab Hajjarian, Seemantini K Nadkarni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Optics express, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zeinab Hajjarian
Seemantini K Nadkarni

Funding

Rapid Fluorescence-Based Determination of Antibiotic SusceptibilityU54EB015408 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PARRISH, JOHN A, SCHACHTER, STEVEN · 2012 to 2022
$49.2M
Blood Coagulation Monitoring at the Point of CareR01HL119867 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NADKARNI, SEEMANTINI K · 2014 to 2018
$2.2M
Intracoronary Laser Speckle Imaging for Atherosclerotic Plaque DiagnosisR21HL088306 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NADKARNI, SEEMANTINI K · 2008 to 2009
$755k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL119867NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL 088306NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL088306NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL 088306-02S1NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB015408NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB015408-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser Speckle Rheology (LSR) is an optical technique to evaluate the viscoelastic properties by analyzing the temporal fluctuations of backscattered speckle patterns. Variations of optical absorption and reduced scattering coefficients further modulate speckle fluctuations, posing a critical challenge for quantitative evaluation of viscoelasticity. We compare and contrast two different approaches applicable for correcting and isolating the collective influence of absorption and scattering, to accurately measure mechanical properties. Our results indicate that the numerical approach of Monte-Carlo ray tracing (MCRT) reliably compensates for any arbitrary optical variations. When scattering dominates absorption, yet absorption is non-negligible, diffusing wave spectroscopy (DWS) formalisms perform similar to MCRT, superseding other analytical compensation approaches such as Telegrapher equation. The computational convenience of DWS greatly simplifies the extraction of viscoelastic properties from LSR measurements in a number of chemical, industrial, and biomedical applications.

Indexed as

LasersLightAbsorptionElastic ModulusRheologyScattering, RadiationSuspensionsTime FactorsViscoelastic SubstancesSuspensionsViscoelastic Substances

Identifiers

PMID24663983
PMCPMC4083052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.