ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2014
Multiple primary tumors following stage II and III rectal cancer in patients receiving radiotherapy, 1998-2010.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risks of colorectal and extracolonic cancers following colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2025Pooled it
- Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy alone for the locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review.International journal of clinical oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Secondary Cancers After Radiation Therapy for Primary Prostate or Rectal Cancer.World journal of surgery · 2016Pooled it
- The impact of single and multiple occurrences, as well as the sequence of occurrences, of primary gastrointestinal cancer on overall survival: a comprehensive analysis based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database in the United States from 2016 to 2019.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024Article
- Preoperative radiotherapy does not improve and may even be detrimental to the long-term prognosis of patients diagnosed with stage III colon adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched SEER database analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Risk and prognosis of secondary bladder cancer after radiation therapy for pelvic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Association of Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer and Second Gynecological Malignant Neoplasms.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Risk and Prognosis of Secondary Bladder Cancer After Radiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Article
- Do Patients with Second Primary Colorectal Cancer Hold the Similar Prognosis and Therapeutic Benefits as Those with Initial Primary Colorectal Cancer?BioMed research international · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis report investigated the impact of radiation therapy among stage II/III rectal cancer patients who were resected for cure and then developed second primary cancer.
methodsThe analysis included patients diagnosed with rectal cancer from 1992 to 2010 and who were registered in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Standardized incidence ratios assessed the location of second primary cancers by the receipt and sequence of radiation therapy. A Cox proportional hazards model examined the predictors for patients who developed second primary cancers.
resultsThe hazard ratio for developing any type of second primary was 12 % higher in patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy, Hazard Ratio and 95 % confidence interval, HR 95 % CI 1.12 (1.0, 1.2), and 33 % lower for patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy, HR 95 % CI 0.75 (0.7, 0.8), relative to patients who did not receive radiation therapy. The location of the second cancer varied by both the receipt and sequence of radiation therapy. Secondary rectal cancers were reduced 170 % after postoperative radiation and 103 % after preoperative radiation, compared to the non-receipt of radiation therapy. The impact of radiation therapy on secondary colon cancers was not as marked. Rectal cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy are at a higher risk of thyroid cancers and leukemia, but males have a lower risk of prostate cancer.
conclusionsWhile preoperative radiation therapy is advantageous for reducing rectal cancer recurrence, this study identifies advantages of postoperative radiation for reducing second primary cancers. This research will help improve recommendations for postdiagnosis surveillance in patients with rectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.