Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24663063›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Differences in the gene expression profiles of haemocytes from schistosome-susceptible and -resistant biomphalaria glabrata exposed to Schistosoma mansoni excretory-secretory products.

Zahida Zahoor, Anne E Lockyer, Angela J Davies, Ruth S Kirk, Aidan M Emery, David Rollinson, Catherine S Jones, Leslie R Noble, Anthony J Walker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biomphalaria glabrata immunity: Post-genome advances.Developmental and comparative immunology · 2020
    Review
  3. Temporal transcriptome change ofCell & bioscience · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Proteomic Analysis ofFrontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
  7. Comparative immunogenomics of molluscs.Developmental and comparative immunology · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zahida ZahoorMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, School of Life Science, Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, United Kingdom; Wolfson Wellcome Biomedical Laboratory, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.
Anne E LockyerWolfson Wellcome Biomedical Laboratory, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Aberdeen University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Angela J DaviesMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, School of Life Science, Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Ruth S KirkMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, School of Life Science, Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Aidan M EmeryWolfson Wellcome Biomedical Laboratory, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.
David RollinsonWolfson Wellcome Biomedical Laboratory, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.
Catherine S JonesInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Aberdeen University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Leslie R NobleInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Aberdeen University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Anthony J WalkerMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, School of Life Science, Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Kingston University · GBNatural History Museum · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 068589/Z/02/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During its life cycle, the helminth parasite Schistosoma mansoni uses the freshwater snail Biomphalaria glabrata as an intermediate host to reproduce asexually generating cercariae for infection of the human definitive host. Following invasion of the snail, the parasite develops from a miracidium to a mother sporocyst and releases excretory-secretory products (ESPs) that likely influence the outcome of host infection. To better understand molecular interactions between these ESPs and the host snail defence system, we determined gene expression profiles of haemocytes from S. mansoni-resistant or -susceptible strains of B. glabrata exposed in vitro to S. mansoni ESPs (20 μg/ml) for 1 h, using a 5K B. glabrata cDNA microarray. Ninety-eight genes were found differentially expressed between haemocytes from the two snail strains, 57 resistant specific and 41 susceptible specific, 60 of which had no known homologue in GenBank. Known differentially expressed resistant-snail genes included the nuclear factor kappa B subunit Relish, elongation factor 1α, 40S ribosomal protein S9, and matrilin; known susceptible-snail specific genes included cathepsins D and L, and theromacin. Comparative analysis with other gene expression studies revealed 38 of the 98 identified genes to be uniquely differentially expressed in haemocytes in the presence of ESPs, thus identifying for the first time schistosome ESPs as important molecules that influence global snail host-defence cell gene expression profiles. Such immunomodulation may benefit the schistosome, enabling its survival and successful development in the snail host.

Indexed as

BiomphalariaImmunity, InnateSchistosomiasis mansoniAnimalsGene Expression RegulationHemocytesHumansSchistosoma mansoni

Identifiers

PMID24663063
PMCPMC3963999
OpenAlexW1974098266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.