Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24663044›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2014

Physicians' attitudes about multiplex tumor genomic testing.

Stacy W Gray, Katherine Hicks-Courant, Angel Cronin, Barrett J Rollins, Jane C Weeks

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 137 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02171286 completednot on this map

The Oncopanel Pilot (TOP) Study

TypeobservationalSponsorBritish Columbia Cancer AgencyRan2014 to 2017Enrolled432ConditionsColorectal Cancer Metastatic, Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, Advanced Melanoma, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
NCT02628379 completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Observational Trial Evaluating Outcomes of FoundationOne - Directed Matched Targeted Therapy in Patients With Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP)

TypeobservationalSponsorFoundation MedicineRan2015 to 2017Enrolled125ConditionsNeoplasms, Unknown Primary, CUP, Metastatic Disease, Poorly Differentiated Adenocarcinoma
NCT03276637 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The MilSeq Project: Enabling Personalized Medicine Through Exome Sequencing in the U.S. Air Force

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2017 to 2020Enrolled105ConditionsHealthy Adults, Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseArmsWhole exome sequencing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 245 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Biomarkers in breast cancer 2024: an updated consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology and the Spanish Society of Pathology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Preparing for the unexpected: Recommendations for returning secondary findings in late-stage cancer care.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Article
  18. OncoCTMiner: streamlining precision oncology trial matching via molecular profile analysis.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stacy W GrayStacy W. Gray, Angel Cronin, Barrett J. Rollins, and Jane C. Weeks, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Stacy W. Gray, Barrett J. Rollins, and Jane C. Weeks, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; and Katherine Hicks-Courant, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.
Katherine Hicks-Courant
Angel Cronin
Barrett J Rollins
Jane C Weeks
St Vincent Hospital · US

Funding

The Use of Whole-Exome Sequencing to Guide the Care of Cancer PatientsU01HG006492 · NHGRI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI JANNE, PASI A, VAN ALLEN, ELIEZER M · 2012 to 2016
$7.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough predictive multiplex somatic genomic tests hold the potential to transform care by identifying targetable alterations in multiple cancer genes, little is known about how physicians will use such tests in practice. PARTICIPANTS AND

methodsBefore the initiation of enterprise-wide multiplex testing at a major cancer center, we surveyed all clinically active adult cancer physicians to assess their current use of somatic testing, their attitudes about multiplex testing, and their genomic confidence.

resultsA total of 160 physicians participated (response rate, 61%): 57% were medical oncologists; 29%, surgeons; 14% radiation oncologists; 37%, women; and 83%, research principal investigators. Twenty-two percent of physicians reported low confidence in their genomic knowledge. Eighteen percent of physicians anticipated testing patients infrequently (≤ 10%), whereas 25% anticipate testing most patients (≥ 90%). Higher genomic confidence was associated with wanting to test a majority of patients (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 6.09; 95% CI, 2.1 to 17.5) and anticipating using actionable (adjusted OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.2) or potentially actionable (adjusted OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.1 to 7.9) test results to inform treatment recommendations. Forty-two percent of physicians endorsed disclosure of uncertain genomic findings to patients.

conclusionPhysicians at a tertiary-care National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center varied considerably in how they planned to incorporate predictive multiplex somatic genomic tests into practice and in their attitudes about the disclosure of genomic information of uncertain significance. Given that many physicians reported low genomic confidence, evidence-based guidelines and enhanced physician genomic education efforts may be needed to ensure that genomically guided cancer care is adequately delivered.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMedical OncologyPhysiciansFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMaleNeoplasmsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID24663044
PMCPMC3992721
OpenAlexW2148565184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.