Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24663019›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

Pharmacokinetics of cefuroxime in porcine cortical and cancellous bone determined by microdialysis.

Mikkel Tøttrup, Tore Forsingdal Hardlei, Michael Bendtsen, Mats Bue, Birgitte Brock, Kurt Fuursted, Kjeld Søballe, Hanne Birke-Sørensen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Spondylodiscitis relevant tissue concentrations of cefuroxime - a large animal microdialysis study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mikkel TøttrupDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Unit Horsens, Horsens, Denmark Orthopaedic Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark mikkel.tottrup@ki.au.dk.
Tore Forsingdal HardleiDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Michael BendtsenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mats BueDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Unit Horsens, Horsens, Denmark Orthopaedic Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Birgitte BrockDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kurt FuurstedStatens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kjeld SøballeOrthopaedic Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Hanne Birke-SørensenOrthopaedic Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKAarhus University · DKRegional Hospital Horsens · DKStatens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, the pharmacokinetics of antimicrobials in bone have been investigated using bone biopsy specimens, but this approach suffers from considerable methodological limitations. Consequently, new methods are needed. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility of microdialysis (MD) for measuring cefuroxime in bone and to obtain pharmacokinetic profiles for the same drug in porcine cortical and cancellous bone. The measurements were conducted in bone wax sealed and unsealed drill holes in cortical bone and in drill holes in cancellous bone and in subcutaneous tissue. As a reference, the free and total plasma concentrations were also measured. The animals received a bolus of 1,500 mg cefuroxime over 30 min. No significant differences were found between the key pharmacokinetic parameters for sealed and unsealed drill holes in cortical bone. The mean ± standard error of the mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values from 0 to 5 h were 6,013 ± 1,339, 3,222 ± 1086, 2,232 ± 635, and 952 ± 290 min · μg/ml for free plasma, subcutaneous tissue, cancellous bone, and cortical bone, respectively (P < 0.01, analysis of variance). The AUC for cortical bone was also significantly different from that for cancellous bone (P = 0.04). This heterogeneous tissue distribution was also reflected in other key pharmacokinetic parameters. This study validates MD as a suitable method for measuring cefuroxime in bone. Cefuroxime penetration was impaired for all tissues, and bone may not be considered one distinct compartment.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone and BonesCefuroximeMicrodialysisSubcutaneous TissueSwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefuroxime

Identifiers

PMID24663019
PMCPMC4068497
OpenAlexW2115153244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.